1st one to answer correctly gets 5 stars. is the seperation between church and state still beneficial?

Question

self explanitory

i need a more complex answer than just yes or no

Answer 1

Yes

The government needs to be inclusive of all the diverse people and the minority needs freedom from the majority. It is not the state's job to impose religion on people.

Answer 2

Beneficial? It is an absolute necessity. It is the religious bias of the world that leads to conflict, aggression and war. Religion is your to practice if you choose. It is your choice to believe as you choose. Forcing anyone else to do so overlooks the diversity of humans who live on this planet.

As the numbers of the world change, the US may find difficulties as the Spanish speaking populations increase. A largely Catholic population could change things for many Christians.

Worldwide, a separation of church and state ensures developing manageable systems and policies.

If the UN adopted a church run model, the largest populations could end up setting the tone for international issues and laws. With 1 billion Chinese or 800 million Hindus, is everyone willing to take on the dominant religion?

International requires it for anyone who is seeking justice.

Answer 3

The history beyond this separation tells us that it is beneficial. The marriage between the Church and the state can be traced back during the edict of Milan conducted by the emperor Constantine. In the early years of the marriage, it caused positive results but later on it caused chaos and misunderstandings. Thus, the concern authorities decided to separate it again.

Answer 4

Yes but to bad -church is good where people come together for a common goal but some of the organizers of the church go to far and think there way is better than every one Else's,this usually leads to conflict possibly war as seen in history by many countries (not so much in America) think of one state supporting one religion or another with tax payer money and another doing the same but with different ideals-The U.S.A would be no more and civil war would be to days topic . PS creator good please lets not keep screwing up what he gave us do ,your best.

Answer 5

Read about the 30 years war that killed 1/3 of the population of Europe. It was between the governments that backed Catholicism, and the governments that backed Protestantism.
The people who died were just expendable in the eyes of the respective churches and their government backers.

Answer 6

Yes. The separation of church and state enables, for instance, a Roman Catholic to be admitted to a Southern Baptist school in Georgia. Also, taxation as it stands today is separate from the church.

Answer 7

the suited of democracy isn't "Majority regulations" -- yet, quite, is a balancing act between the desires of the people and the rights of persons. prestige via way of democraxy and retaining the separation of church and state does not be at odds. As President, my activity may be to enforce the regulations of Congress. yet I additionally might would desire to comprehend the rulings of The ultimate court docket. It does not count variety variety if a majority of people voted to help a regulation that violates the form -- via way of actuality they do now no longer enact regulations. yet, for the sake of argument, think of that the Congress exceeded this regulation. i'd desire to veto the bill (which i might). yet then Congress would desire to override this veto. If that took place, then i might have self belief in the court docket to overturn it as unconstitutional -- which they might. there maintains to be a capability venture. A constitutional ammendment would desire to be exceeded. In that even, i'd desire to now no longer do some thing approximately it. regardless of the reality that, i might resign my place as president and bypass to a larger enlightened u . s . a ..

Answer 8

yes, it is beneficial
for if the seperation never occured, or if they are still together, great chaos would pull us all apart.

Answer 9

No