English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

self explanitory

2007-09-17 13:38:25 · 9 answers · asked by Katelyn D 2 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

i need a more complex answer than just yes or no

2007-09-17 13:44:08 · update #1

9 answers

Yes

The government needs to be inclusive of all the diverse people and the minority needs freedom from the majority. It is not the state's job to impose religion on people.

2007-09-17 13:42:45 · answer #1 · answered by the Boss 7 · 0 1

Beneficial? It is an absolute necessity. It is the religious bias of the world that leads to conflict, aggression and war. Religion is your to practice if you choose. It is your choice to believe as you choose. Forcing anyone else to do so overlooks the diversity of humans who live on this planet.

As the numbers of the world change, the US may find difficulties as the Spanish speaking populations increase. A largely Catholic population could change things for many Christians.

Worldwide, a separation of church and state ensures developing manageable systems and policies.

If the UN adopted a church run model, the largest populations could end up setting the tone for international issues and laws. With 1 billion Chinese or 800 million Hindus, is everyone willing to take on the dominant religion?

International requires it for anyone who is seeking justice.

2007-09-17 14:47:54 · answer #2 · answered by guru 7 · 0 0

The history beyond this separation tells us that it is beneficial. The marriage between the Church and the state can be traced back during the edict of Milan conducted by the emperor Constantine. In the early years of the marriage, it caused positive results but later on it caused chaos and misunderstandings. Thus, the concern authorities decided to separate it again.

2007-09-17 14:00:37 · answer #3 · answered by none 1 · 0 0

Yes but to bad -church is good where people come together for a common goal but some of the organizers of the church go to far and think there way is better than every one Else's,this usually leads to conflict possibly war as seen in history by many countries (not so much in America) think of one state supporting one religion or another with tax payer money and another doing the same but with different ideals-The U.S.A would be no more and civil war would be to days topic . PS creator good please lets not keep screwing up what he gave us do ,your best.

2007-09-17 14:02:10 · answer #4 · answered by AD&D 3 · 0 0

Read about the 30 years war that killed 1/3 of the population of Europe. It was between the governments that backed Catholicism, and the governments that backed Protestantism.
The people who died were just expendable in the eyes of the respective churches and their government backers.

2007-09-17 14:30:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. The separation of church and state enables, for instance, a Roman Catholic to be admitted to a Southern Baptist school in Georgia. Also, taxation as it stands today is separate from the church.

2007-09-17 13:47:23 · answer #6 · answered by Meredith K 1 · 0 0

the suited of democracy isn't "Majority regulations" -- yet, quite, is a balancing act between the desires of the people and the rights of persons. prestige via way of democraxy and retaining the separation of church and state does not be at odds. As President, my activity may be to enforce the regulations of Congress. yet I additionally might would desire to comprehend the rulings of The ultimate court docket. It does not count variety variety if a majority of people voted to help a regulation that violates the form -- via way of actuality they do now no longer enact regulations. yet, for the sake of argument, think of that the Congress exceeded this regulation. i'd desire to veto the bill (which i might). yet then Congress would desire to override this veto. If that took place, then i might have self belief in the court docket to overturn it as unconstitutional -- which they might. there maintains to be a capability venture. A constitutional ammendment would desire to be exceeded. In that even, i'd desire to now no longer do some thing approximately it. regardless of the reality that, i might resign my place as president and bypass to a larger enlightened u . s . a ..

2016-12-26 15:56:42 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

yes, it is beneficial
for if the seperation never occured, or if they are still together, great chaos would pull us all apart.

2007-09-17 13:45:18 · answer #8 · answered by cherry_bananas_cookies 4 · 0 0

No

2007-09-17 13:45:12 · answer #9 · answered by Katie 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers