No politicians are talking about health care. Hillary and all the rest are talking about universal health coverage. Coverage not care. Universal health coverage means that the insurance companies will rake in more tax dollars, the cost of care will go up and the net result will be even worse care than we have now.
The best health care in the world is available in the U.S, but only to a few, and most of them get it for free. Like 4 generations of the Bush family.
For the bulk population, the best countries for health care have lower taxes, earlier retirement and shorter work weeks than we do, and they all have the dreaded "socialized" medicine rather than price fixing and gouging by the medical business as we have here.
In a nut shell, I don't think Hillary has any answers, just more hype.
2007-09-17 13:21:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
I think it is as messed up as the first one. I think that any socialized health care is wrong, and cannot possibly work. Take a look at places in the world where they have socialized medicine. They are all grossly inefficient, and low quality care. Canada is a prime example.
Nikki...great idea. Take the Bush tax cuts from the wealthy, and the poor can have health care, but they would no longer have jobs. I have been able to hire 6 people that I could not have otherwise hired. These people are making 6 figure incomes. By the way, that is one HE!! of a lot more than my tax cut was. Of course they would probably rather have free health care, right?
2007-09-17 20:14:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Yesterday , my 9 year old told me after we had BBQ with John McCain , she said " daddy Hillary looks like a mean scarey person and if she is in charge of my health care I would rather die " I asked her about Obama , she said "his name is too much like Osama , and he is funny looking like a cartoon " ... I asked her about McCain , she said " I hope he is president , I asked him if he would protect me and my friends from mean people and he said YES ..."
I do not talk politics around my children, she has heard the news , and watched TV ,and came to her own opinion , and I must say kids say the d@mnedest things , Maybe with the innocence of children , and their open heartedness , we should eliminate DC and let kids run the show .....
My daughter even took 200 dollars of her money to make up for care packages for the troops , 2 for guys and 2 for women , ...Does any politician do this ..NO , we pay to fly them there so they can rack up votes for their party ..
If the Universal Health Care is ever adopted we will pay a record high tax , and that is just a start , those 47 million Hillary talks about ..over half are illegals , and the majority of the others qualify for Medicaid / medicare , but do not want it , to me that is kind of forced health care is it not ...
It will not cover low income families , they have medicaid , and medicare , so that is just a fog screen to get people to fall for this idea , hillary ,and others only want this because of the stock they have in trading group " American Health Insurance Corp." going to universal health care will make them billionaires , and if hillary tries to do as she suggested years ago about converting Americans to the Euro Dollar , her and other democrats stock in foreign currency will cause them to have a net worth that tops Trump , and Gates ...
2007-09-17 20:27:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Insensitively Honest 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
I think like the rest of her campaign, flawed & poorly orchestrated. OH it looks all pretty yet lacks depth, integrity and common sense. The new plan was compared on ABC News w/ Charles Gibson tonight. I like him, he is honest. Her hair do's changed but the core plan is not far apart from the second one.
I do not agree with anything she professes. Fortunately for those of US who do not like her brand of politics she has foot in mouth disease that may kill her chances. But ?
She has made no provisions spoken so far about real issues. Tax increases, how? Deflate the rich pockets? Illegal activity = more jails? Come on, let's get real . Just more smoke and mirrors as far as I am concerned. Thank you.
2007-09-17 20:46:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
I want to know how they came up with the figure of $110,000,000,000 dollars for the FIRST YEAR. HOLY COW!!! If they say 110 billion, you can count it costing at least half again that much. YEOW! Talk about braking the bank. What is the proposed cost after 5 years? Ten? 20?
Hillary has just lost any right to talk about any social spending by Bush.
2007-09-17 20:18:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
Universal heath care is as big as a joke as Hilary is.
2007-09-17 20:37:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sweet Victory 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
cer been to a zoo? Ever see a camel?
A camel is a race horse designed by a politician.
2007-09-17 21:30:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by TedEx 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think that her and rest of her Communocratic Party should be blasted into space with Barry Bonds' 756th Homerun Ball.
2007-09-17 20:14:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
what do you think of having your taxes raised big time?why do you want to pay for my health care.that's what the witch is trying to do, take your money pay for your neighbors health plan.now everyone is equally miserable and poor.great plan?????
people never fu*ck*ing learn,there is no free lunch or free health care!
2007-09-17 20:15:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
I think it will be great , take all that Bush tax cut money from the millionaires and help the poor have health care
2007-09-17 20:14:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nicki 6
·
5⤊
6⤋