2007-09-17 13:01:00 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Darwin does not deny that there was Adam and Eve he simply says that through natural selection organisms have changed
2007-09-17 13:03:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
The creation story in Genesis is based on two stories and they slightly contradict each other-ffrf.org (and countless other atheistic, non-religion associated sites) point it out but the contradicting verses are right there, in the Bible, for anyone to read themself.
Darwin semi-supported the Adam and Eve thing, so I would say neither...'The truth is out there'...still, just no one knows yet.
:-)
2007-09-18 05:27:16 · answer #2 · answered by strpenta 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adam and Eve!! Genesis 1
2007-09-17 13:04:35 · answer #3 · answered by beanhead1972((14HIM)) 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Adam and Eve
2007-09-17 13:08:06 · answer #4 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Adam and Eve
2007-09-17 13:04:41 · answer #5 · answered by multipły 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Adam and Eve
2007-09-17 13:04:09 · answer #6 · answered by Nico 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Darwin may not be 100% accurate but Adam & Eve is a definite NO.
They had 3 MALE children. How did they populate the Earth if they had 3 MALE children????
Was Eden in the hills of West Virginia?
2007-09-17 13:07:02 · answer #7 · answered by BOOM 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Adam & Eve
2007-09-17 13:06:46 · answer #8 · answered by Boo! 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Why would that be a choice? There are many religions,each with it's own account of creation. As to Darwin,we always knew species evolve but there is still no evidence for a species evolving into another species. You posit a false dichotomy.
2007-09-17 13:05:27 · answer #9 · answered by Galahad 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Adam & Eve, because do I look like a friggin gorilla?
2007-09-17 13:18:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋