Two commercial airliners crashed into the two towers of the World Trade Center. A commercial airliner crashed into the Pentagon building. A fourth airliner crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. On a personal note, two people I knew were on the plane which struck the Pentagon. But, since there are so many non-believers around I think I'll sell tin-foil hats and contribute the proceeds to some charity.
2007-09-17 11:47:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by desertviking_00 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't think you're getting through (to me at least).
Of course the plane went down, and I'm sure more erratically than you'd see on a normal flight.
You also have the plane that is shown next to the towers. Any small movement is going to appear amplified.
Why is the obvious, the most difficult to believe?
We have the video of these scum boarding the planes. We have audio, of the scum, when they thought they were speaking to the hostages only.
Then we have claims from bin laden, and his side-kick that they planned these actions.
Why do you care if a video of an airplane aimed directly at the towers dropped a few feet to ensure they didn't miss?
I just don't understand what possible reason this issue is an issue.
Is this part of someone's new conspiracy theory?
Sorry for my frustration, I realize you're just asking.
B-good
megs: The beams melted, hence the appearance of a planned implosion. It's like turning your skeleton to rubber. You'd fall straight down. You're repeating the words of those who have no clue about any science; period. The Rosie included...you're in great company...lol
Edit: I'll offer my sevices and answer any friggin question you like; IT AIN'T THAT HARD! What "really happened?". Grow up!
2007-09-17 18:58:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr. Me 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
If someone knew the real truth behind 9/11, would you be willing to purchase a book on it?
As it turns out, many have written their versions and sold books and even made some movies.
The truth, the facts, nobody knows, and probably will never fully know.
All that can be offered on this terrible tragedy in American History...are clues that may lead to a source.
The general belief in terrorist attacks, similar to many other attacks that form a chain going back thirty, even forty years...may be wrong.
I said...may be wrong.
Again, all one can do is speculate.
Most disturbing is that many have formed opinions without knowing enough.
Isn't this contrary to the American way of judicial prudence?
2007-09-17 19:03:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
well the investigation of some people are giving us food for thought and we should look into the theories; the buildings did go down just like a planned implosion; when we were close to the event, we couldn't even contemplate anything else which was wrong; we really need to be able to ask questions and get answers no matter what; that is what freedom is all about ; if politics weren't corrupt, we wouldn't have to go down that path but unfortunately they are and we do.
2007-09-17 18:55:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by sml 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I never cease to be amazed at the stupidity of some of the questions here. Can any of these septics explain how dead passengers were found in all the buildings that were hit. Or could they have walked there !!
2007-09-17 18:39:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the buildings were blown up from the inside, whether planes ran into them or not. there are tons of videos that have brought this to the forefront. ask anyone who does building demolition. its pretty much ridiculously obvious that the buildings were wired with bombs when you see them go down. i'm pretty tired of this whole subject, so all i'm saying is that a LOT of people were in on this whole thing.
2007-09-17 18:33:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by megs 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
wooow i havent see it
take a look on these instead
http://welttag.blogspot.com/2007/05/9-11-revisited.html
2007-09-17 22:17:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Adler 5
·
0⤊
0⤋