2007-09-17 07:40:28 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, he is one of the worst next to Regan, and Bush Sr. The only reason that people would say that he is a good president is because for one they are gaining something from him being in office be it a tax break or whatever, also in my opinion they are as ignorant an unfeeling as he is towards soldiers and minorities in America. Republicans can care less about Americans starving or soldiers coming home missing arms and legs with broken dreams and hearts. For those who voted for Bush it's all about keeping themselves comfortable at any cost. What I have noticed about the people who love Bush is that they usually didn't like Carter or Clinton and it's funny because you would hate two people who negotiated and kept us out of harms way but you love a war monger who wants nothing more that to keep us in harms way to further his economic goals. STOP BEING LEMMINGS following the Republican party even if it's wrong. Use your on head. Bush is one of the worst presidents because of what he wouldn't do for America and that is put his greed aside for the betterment of the nation.
2007-09-17 09:28:10 · answer #1 · answered by T W 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Having lived through the years that former president Jimmy " Hamas is not a terrorist group" Carter I know that he is far worse than Mr. Bush would or could ever be. However the man in office has gone past Mr. Carter in two years while it to Mr. Carter to do in 4.
2016-05-17 06:00:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
History will be the one to judge. The best presidents in history were recognized as such after dead. However, if you want to compare Mr Bush with living presidents, NO, the worse one is Carter, followed by Clinton, for different reasons, but still the worst rotten apples under the Presidential tree
2007-09-17 07:51:05 · answer #3 · answered by Bego?a R 3 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Senior or Junior? At least the one got ran out after one term.
I think its a crime how the dollar has fallen since Bush got into office. In 2003 the British pound was around $1.50, now it's over $2.00. Brits vacation in America, like Americans used to vacation in third world countries, because its so cheap.
2007-09-17 07:49:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
it depends on your point of view. if you believe that America and democracy are fundamentally bad and that white strait christian men are responsible for all evil in world then yes.
otherwise you will recognize the the usual measures of a president, like security, the economy the unemployment rate the record setting revenues and the routine record setting stock market reports, etc. , etc..
2007-09-17 08:10:40 · answer #5 · answered by karl k 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not even close! GWB will go down in history as a good president, unlike Clinton or Carter. unemployment at it's lowest, great economy, Better homeland security, and built up the military that Clinton downsized. Was never impeached.
Faithful to wife and country. Has fought the terrorists that Clinton ignored many times. Cut taxes...........
2007-09-17 07:49:22 · answer #6 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋
No. Mr. Bush has done some good things: the economy and the war against terrorists.
2007-09-17 07:49:13 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
in my lifetime, yes.
I don't have enough evidence of the past 42 presidents to compare and contrast them to Dubya though, so I can't answer for "ever".
2007-09-17 07:48:37 · answer #8 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You know he wouldn't be so bad if he had not had his drug driving offenses erased, deserted his military unit, got us into a terrible war, infringed the constitution, and is bringing America to its knees. Without that he is an alright guy!
2007-09-17 07:48:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
We need to wait until he gets out of office before we can judge.
2007-09-17 08:08:00 · answer #10 · answered by wondermom 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋