English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

Is there a link to this proposal? I know she is revealing her plan tonight 8pm ET on the web. Did she release it already to the press? If so, could you please leave a link because I haven't been able to find it. Can't form an opinion until I hear what the proposal actually is.

EDIT: Never mind Kyle. Thank you "The Wiz." It sounds good so far, and makes sense. I suspect every one of your conservative answerers who are screaming Anti-American and whining about taxes haven't even bothered to check it out lol. They sound like a bunch of parrots.

EDIT: Good example? The guy right below me. She isn't forcing Mom and Pop stores to do anything. It stated right there in that article that small businesses will NOT be required to provide insurance.

2007-09-17 06:48:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

It's not gonna fly. It's forcing the Mom and Pop grocery store to pay for the medical bills for its employees, and the way things are going right now the only grocery store left will be Wal-Mart. You can't punish middle America every time.

The best choice is making medical care all government, then fixing the price of medical costs and specialists so big Rx execs aren't making second Porsche payments on your chronic tennis elbow. We need a system that will actually find cures instead of treating the symptoms. Cancer, HIV and other known killers should be cured by now if it was better attacked by the undermanned research field.

2007-09-17 06:52:10 · answer #2 · answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7 · 3 3

The only thing I've seen anyone comment on yet is the price tag, which would be okay if it's even remotely close. We really have to move on this. It's economically infeasible to have hospitals treat the uninsured in the emergency room, and it's really unfair for someone to wind up insolvent over an illness, when someone else who works no harder has coverage. I'll wait to pass judgment on her plan until I see the specifics of it.

2007-09-17 07:19:14 · answer #3 · answered by Clint 7 · 0 2

Did she say anything about requiring education and some verbal skills in her plans?

Nonsense. It won't fly, it requires a national vote anyway if mandated and she pushes that concept...hehehe foot in mouth told u so!!! Vote for the Hillabeast and expect more mandates and requirements per her demise. Devise? Play on words her game. I just do not see it. She avoids the core contributors to the excess"pork" in the health care industry. HER major campaign contributors. Now where have I heard that before?

2007-09-17 06:58:10 · answer #4 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 3 2

Hey it sounds great - Something for nothing. And I'm not even poor or in need of help with healthcare insurance. Wait on the details and see how many of us have to give up our firstborns to help fund this socialistic experiment!

2007-09-17 06:42:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 9 1

So now I'm "required" to carry health insurance. Are you sure this is the USA and not the USSR? It is laughable that she says it expands personal choice when in reality I "must" have it and if the government says I can afford then I have to pay for the full amount anyway. I see nothing in this that indicates reform except for an erosion of my free choice..........

2007-09-17 06:44:38 · answer #6 · answered by Brian 7 · 9 1

Insane and anti-American- The government does NOT have the right to force people to have insurance as her plan requires. It is just one more way to keep the populace dependent upon the government therefore guarantee herself and her socialist friends their votes.

2007-09-17 06:45:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

She's off her rocker: services are not rights! Is getting an oil change a right? How about valet parking? These are services, not rights. Rights are free, you are born with them. Surely America will have learned from her attempts to institute this program during her husband's presidency. Obviously, I am against socialized health care.

2007-09-17 06:44:54 · answer #8 · answered by Pfo 7 · 8 2

ive always wonderd this--y dont u have a national healh service like in the U.K,i mean its not like ur country is poor like we are,it should b free healhcare in the U.S

2007-09-17 09:58:56 · answer #9 · answered by tasty 7 · 0 0

Traveling down the road to serfdom

2007-09-17 06:58:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers