2007-09-17 06:30:01 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Oh yes! Down to the last drop - finger lickin' good! I can't believe I always eat the whole thing! It's magically delicious and just grrrrreat! I go coockoo for it and just a little dab'll do ya. All in all, Smuckers really satisfies.
2007-09-17 19:08:55 · answer #1 · answered by Mrs. Smith 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I realize that Smuckers is a family name, but if there was an actual food named Smuckers, I would hesitate to try it.
2007-09-17 13:37:25 · answer #2 · answered by kathi1vee 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not necessarily...I mean, suppose you have to see a dentist, and when you get there his name is Dr. Smuckers. That would be odd.
2007-09-17 13:37:25 · answer #3 · answered by Tut Uncommon 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not only good, but Greeeeat!
Besides the Smuckers name is now a billion dollar corporation.
2007-09-17 13:36:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
My name's not Smuckers, but I'm still good ;-)
2007-09-17 13:36:35 · answer #5 · answered by ~Josie~ 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
What's in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet..... I suppose the same principal that applies to roses and skunk cabbages should apply to jelly.
2007-09-17 13:37:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd certainly hope so. I wouldn't want awful jams and jellies just because they have a brand name on the jar.
2007-09-17 13:36:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It better be with a name like that
2007-09-17 13:36:02 · answer #8 · answered by Lov'n IT! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because Willard Scott says so!
2007-09-17 13:37:26 · answer #9 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not as good as Dog Vomit or Nuns and Orphans eaten by rats!
(If you get this reference, you too, are old like me :P)
2007-09-17 13:37:46 · answer #10 · answered by Greg R (2015 still jammin') 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋