Eat a snake or frog?

Question

only had a snake and a frog. and nothing else to survive on.

which one would you choose. i heard not bad, but some may say gross.

i would have to go with snake.
but frog legs are ok.

ok for those "specified people"

they don't have poison..

there just regular snake and frogs.

Answer 1

Frog. Legs. Definitely !
It's great--it tastes like a combo of chicken and fish!!

Answer 2

I've eaten both, so I would probably eat the snake first and save the frog for when the snake is all gone. If the snake eats the frog before I eat the snake, then I guess I'm screwed.

Answer 3

If you had absolutely no other information on either the snake or the frog...Go with the snake for safety sake and cut off the head.
There are more frogs out there with poisonous skins/bodies
(defense mechanism) than snakes who only carry their venom in venom sacks which are connected to their fangs (attack mechanism).

Answer 4

I love Both....but perfer Frog legs especially right out of the deep fryer

Answer 5

Well I ate frog legs before

Answer 6

not all would be poisionous..

so have to be a snake. fill me up more.have to be a pretty big snake. anaconda size. so i can have left overs.

if i ate frog i would need more frogs.

Answer 7

Snake. More meat, more filling.

I'm sure my fellow Australians (aborigines) would say that snake tastes better too.

Answer 8

Both, but I've only had frog.

Answer 9

they'd probably both be poisonous- I'd cut open the snake stomach and eat what's inside.

Answer 10

snake