First hanoi jane, then persia pelosi, now fatah fields?
2007-09-17 04:57:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
6⤋
So in your view of America, everybody should just shut up and do as they’re told. People can still say pretty much what they want in a free society.
Whatever “heroes” you want to define for liberals is of no consequence to this liberal. I judge for myself whose opinions I respect and whose I don’t. Conservatives, like you, should stick to defining their own heroes for themselves, if they can find any, and be very careful about throwing around the term hypocrite, lest it come back to bite you.
2007-09-17 05:00:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by tribeca_belle 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Just scares the crap out of ya doesn't it. So what if Ms Fields expressed her opinion. I didn't see it. I don't watch silly award shows.
I would like a source for your statement that female societies had more war. Because I think you're wrong.
2007-09-17 05:05:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by gone 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Who really cares about Sally Fields?
Truthseeker:
That lame list is posted constantly. There is a list of Democrats who are equally corrupt. If that's the best you can do, save it. When Democrat's can explain to me why Gerry Studds was reelected 6 times after playing with an underage male congressional page, I'll let the pukes that make up the Democratic party take the moral high ground.
2007-09-17 05:00:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Perhaps if we all concentrated on the issues that truly matter instead of the ones that divide us we could better our nation and actually get along... United we stand, divided we fall is more than just a saying...
2007-09-17 04:58:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by vinster82 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
They need all the help they can get as there losing all the USA for there amnesty bill sell out & Defeat of our troops And there still trying to pass another amnesty AG amnesty & Dream act this week keep on top of there sellout>>
2007-09-17 05:14:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by 45 auto 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
"P.S. Matriarchial societies have MORE wars not less in history."
Care to elaborate on that with some proof & examples? Or are we just supposed to take your word for it?
2007-09-17 04:58:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Wiz 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Nice collection of faults.
My answer is: no
I didn't see that.
Did she really swear? That's childish. Anyway, do you have a collection of examples that show that matriarchial societies have more wars? I'm interested.
P.S. Your collection is nice, but truth seeker's is bigger. And lesse, oh yes.. bigger is better!
2007-09-17 05:00:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by DT 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Umm...yeah....thanks....I never realized until this moment that liberals had a monopoly on hypocrisy.
How about we try something new in America? What if...we hold each person accountable for their words and deeds REGARDLESS of political persuasion? Wouldn't that be a novel idea?
2007-09-17 04:58:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
1⤋
Yes, Bush has created a generation of young women that are pro torture, war, and killing...lucky us.
2007-09-17 05:02:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by alphabetsoup2 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Hey! You left out the James Brolin's snicker.(on the radio)...Come-on...Be fair, He's my new hero..( but then ..I hate compassionate weaklings..)
2007-09-17 04:58:10
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋