Why is more than one thought about anything?

Answer 1

Definitely. People can have more than one thought at a time. We can even do more than one thing at a time which requires thought for each process...so that answers your question :)

Answer 2

a person can't have more than one thought. they can only think or do one thing at a time. what seems like doing 2 things at a time is really the mind quickly alternating back and forth on each thing only seeming to be doing 2 things at once.

your question is weird. makes my mind feel weird when i read it.

Answer 3

a thought is something a person knows is true because a thought is part of you,

Answer 4

Because it provides a backup thought in case you are unable to finish your first one (as it appears you have done).

Answer 5

Because if everyone thought the same, It would be a bloody boring world !!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 6

Why is more than one thought about anything possible?

'A. Taking Possession
§ 54

We take possession of a thing [a] by directly grasping it physically, [b] by forming it, and [c] by merely marking it as ours.

Addition: These modes of taking possession involve the advance from the category of singularity to that of universality. It is only of a single thing that we can take possession physically, while marking a thing as mine is taking possession of it in idea. In the latter case I have an idea of the thing and mean that the thing as a whole is mine, not simply the part which I can take into my possession physically.'
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/property.htm#PR54


Possession, property possessed, The notions and concepts for what necessitates for rightly possessing, not wrongly possessing differs according to the contemporary notions for the Creation belief and the authoring for such knowledge of right by a God or Gods or a mental or conscious nature conception for its Creation and laws.


'(4) Just as private property is only the perceptible expression of the fact that man becomes objective for himself and at the same time becomes to himself a strange and inhuman object; just as it expresses the fact that the manifestation of his life is the alienation of his life, that his realisation is his loss of reality, is an alien reality: so, the positive transcendence of private property – i.e., the perceptible appropriation for and by man of the human essence and of human life, of objective man, of human achievements should not be conceived merely in the sense of immediate, one-sided enjoyment, merely in the sense of possessing, of having. Man appropriates his comprehensive essence in a comprehensive manner, that is to say, as a whole man. Each of his human relations to the world – seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, feeling, thinking, observing, experiencing, wanting, acting, loving – in short, all the organs of his individual being, like those organs which are directly social in their form, are in their objective orientation, or in their orientation to the object, the appropriation of the object, the appropriation of human reality. Their orientation to the object is the manifestation of the human reality, [For this reason it is just as highly varied as the determinations of human essence and activities] it is human activity and human suffering, for suffering, humanly considered, is a kind of self-enjoyment of man. '

http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htm#44CC6

The philosophy that the good things in life possessed and protected as private property through the excertion of self through painful activity is self fullfilling and therefor a positive and self enjoyment of man for himself as proof to himself that he or she is in rightful possession and his self is rightfully socially possessed as a self for others for self.

Answer 7

This question doesn't make sense...