2007-09-16 18:50:59 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Who ever says Unforgiven was better than No Surrender is a blind WWE mark. Unforgiven was terrible i mean we had 2 decent matches, a wwe title match that went for 7 mins that finished on a dq. I have seen better Raw shows than that. No Surrender had good matches like Lethal v Kurt,Abyss v Kurt, Kaz v Roode Tag team battle royal and a 4 star match in Joe v Cage so that sums up this debate.Unforgiven 4/10 No surrender 7/10
2007-09-17 00:16:31 · answer #1 · answered by The Perfect One! 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Best match at Unforgiven - Candice Michelle vs Beth Pheonix
Worst match at Unforgiven - John Cena vs Randy Orton
I was angry that Cena retained his championship because of his disqualification advantage. The diva match WAS truly the best match of them all. The Triple Threat sucked and The Undertaker didn't get a big pop, or even a minor pop!
4/10 C-
2007-09-16 18:57:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
CM Punk vs. Elijah Burke: B
MVP/Matt Hardy vs. Deuce/Domino: C
Triple H vs. Carlito: C
Candice Michelle vs. Beth Phoenix: F (because Pheonix lost)
The Great Khali vs. Batista vs. Mysterio: D
Cade/Murdoch vs. London/Kendrick: C
John Cena vs. Randy Orton: F (cheap DQ finish)
Undertaker vs. Mark Henry: D
My overall grade for Unforgiven: D
2007-09-17 05:44:26 · answer #3 · answered by DeadSurvivor 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I GIVE UNFORGIVEN AN A+. SO IF I GAVE IT THAT THEN THERE IS NOTHING BAD OR UGLY ABOUT IT.
ON THE OTHER HAND, NO SURRENDER I GIVE A F-. POSSIBLY THE WORST WRESTLING SHOW IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND. I CANT IMAGINE HOW BAD BOUND FOR GLORY IS GONNA BE!
2007-09-17 10:20:40 · answer #4 · answered by BOB 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
GOOD. HHH WINNING.
BAD CENA WINNING
UGLY BETH PHOENIX
B-
SURE IT WAS.
2007-09-16 20:53:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋