You are flying at low altitude so suddenly dropping in the air won't be enough to knock out the passengers or crew. You will see everything from dipping to crashing.
Would you rather die by an explosion of fire or a sea of drowning?
2007-09-16 18:16:19 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Also state "Why" you would prefer a certain kind of crash.
Some of these answers are really funny though and nonetheless strategic too.
2007-09-16 18:25:49 · update #1
I'm gonna be the one who actually brings a parachute just in case
2007-09-16 18:19:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If i became into going to die the two way, i could decide on the explosion. this is a quicker death & i would not decide to work out myself or anybody else go through a sluggish death. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that i will declare that i think of I heard that statistically persons are greater probable to stay to tell the tale a crash on the sea than they could on a mountainside. that's incredibly conceivable that some human beings could stay to tell the tale the sea crash & use the survival products on the plane (flotation contraptions, rafts, ect) to stay to tell the tale till they may be rescued.
2016-11-14 16:05:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd prefer a crash landing on water with all fuel tanks virtually empty for maximum bouyancy. If it's a controlled crash landing and the plane doesn't break up, that might provide enough float time for everyone to get out.
Former Air Force flight mechanic on the big jets.
2007-09-16 18:25:55 · answer #3 · answered by Frosty 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mountain sounds like the easier of the two. Death would most likely be sudden. If the plane did no explode on impact into the water, you could be out in the sea, and either starve, dehydrate, or be eaten. More suffering in that!
2007-09-16 18:25:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
well, definatly neither!!!
but if i had to choose, i would probably choose the fire on the mountain, because it would get the pain and suffering over quick, and rescuers would be able to find the plane easier. If the plane was in the ocean, it would be really hard to find and identify people's bodies.
2007-09-16 18:22:23 · answer #5 · answered by cheercutie 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Explosion!
I`d hate crashing-surviving-drowning...
I`d rather die quickly in the explosion.
2007-09-16 18:20:14 · answer #6 · answered by Roxie 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
ill rather die in a mountain than in sea
2007-09-16 18:22:53 · answer #7 · answered by arif pasha 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i prefer the ocean. maybe I'll have a chance of living if not I've always loved the ocean anyway!!!
2007-09-16 18:30:20 · answer #8 · answered by countrygirl969702 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Remember your seat cushion is a flotation device, lol
yeah, right
:)
2007-09-16 18:47:19 · answer #9 · answered by Cheeky 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Crashing into a mountain.. That would be quicker...
2007-09-16 18:22:26 · answer #10 · answered by af wife 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋