It was definitely a liberal jury.
2007-09-16 18:14:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
7⤋
i don't think of he did it. i comprehend he did. I watched the trial. I observed the evidence, and that i bear in suggestions the blood path, which secure the bloody glove, the bloody sock, the bloody white bronco upholstery, and the suspicious cuts on OJ's hands. I additionally bear in suggestions the DNA assessments the proved that the blood of three and in common terms 3 human beings have been contemporary on the crime scene, Nichole Brown, Ron Goldman, and OJ Simpson. For the record: OJ became fairly prosperous and have been for a protracted time. fairly high priced footwear have been probable all he had. Why does not he positioned on them to kill somebody? It wasn't like he could not discover the money for to change them. additionally, OJ isn't an exceedingly vivid guy. a clever man or woman does not bypass away a blood path that Helen Keller ought to persist with. What OJ is, in spite of the fact that, is wealthy sufficient to hire fairly vivid attorneys able to choosing an exceedingly stupid jury waiting to be hoodwinked into letting the Juice unfastened.
2016-12-17 03:12:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Contrary to what some conservatives think, not everything can be divided up into "what liberals think" and "what conservatives think" and be relevant. There is no logical reason anyone's political leanings would help them decide if O.J. did it. I'm a moderate, and yes, I think he did it. Boy do I think he did it. Where do I fall on your political/O.J. scale? Never mind, I don't really want to know.
EDIT: Seems I'm not the only one who can't see what being a liberal or a conservative has to do with O.J.'s guilt or innocence. Starting to get the point?
2007-09-16 18:59:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Everybody thinks that OJ killed Nicole and Ron.
2007-09-16 18:18:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by the hump 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
I am a liberal, but the fact that I and many others feel that OJ killed Nicole and Ron have NOTHING to do with liberalism, it has to do with the facts.
2007-09-16 18:12:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Don Drapers woman 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
I don't know why this is a lib/con thing, but he was found not guilty, so there isn't much can be done even if he did, unless he admits to it. But I do believe that whole trial made a mockery of the justice system, just like Paris Hilton's jail sentence did.
2007-09-16 18:30:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes I believe he killed them. What does being liberal or conservative have to do with it?
2007-09-16 18:15:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Everyone knows that he did it. What we don't know is, what does being a liberal have to do with this question.?? Why can't you leave politics out of it.
2007-09-16 18:47:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Due to irregularities in the investigation - it is not possible to determine whether he did the killings or not.
Both sides are blowing smoke - and "knowing" something from their own wishes and imagination.
2007-09-16 18:40:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think that it's pretty safe to say almost everyone thinks he did it. The Goldmans got the rights to published his book, but changed the title from If I did it to I did it.
2007-09-16 18:15:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yes. What does that have to do with being a liberal? It sounds like you have been brain washed.
2007-09-16 18:18:11
·
answer #11
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
6⤊
1⤋