Could black holes be the reverse effect of a big bang?

Question

Could the big bang have resulted from a previous big crunch in the unverseses existance that condensed the universe so small it started to rapidly expand again? In other words could it be cyclical the big bang and big crunch?

So the big crunch would be when black holes condense our universe faster then it can expand right?

Answer 1

I just LOVE philosophical questions like this...Perhaps the anti-bang??? Well maybe so we all are guessing anyway...I just got caught up on Hawking's Paradox the other day dealing with the demise of black holes and I'm not sure of anything anymore but to me a black hole is the silent partner of the universe who has the ability to occupy very little space but as expected express himself very well if visited...The balance of energy in the universe is always being sloshed around from equal to unequal and today the BH is the soupe de' jour ...From any ones point of view though something has to balance all the exothermic zaps and as far as I'm concerned your perception of the big bang reverse might need to be refined into the energy balancing check valve of the big bang...this is when to much energy is expended it just gets black holed,,,,I wish they had a better name,,,perhaps an antipodal area.???? what do you think...???...Well good luck fro the E//...

Answer 2

actually white holes are the hypothetical opposite of blackholes. though none are known to exist. The big bang has a lot of overlap attributes such as the break down of Planck constants near a black hole, but black holes are also at the center of galaxies and help maintain their lifecycle.

if enough black holes somehow formed from accretion (coming together of matter by means of gravity) we might see something like a big crunch or compacting of the universe, as some theorists have discussed in the past.