For instance, we use terms like "masculinity," "justice" and "goodness," but these terms seem slippery. I also once took a course in the philosophy of art. We never did figure out the essence of art. Some say that art has no essence or that it cannot be define. Granted, somebody can propose a stipulative definition. Nevertheless, how does one define something without begging the question? Someone may suggest that we know what art is by means of the necessary and sufficient conditions that inform it. But those necessary and sufficient conditions seem debatable. Therefore, I believe that we often or always use language without really understanding what we're saying. It is amazing that communication occurs at all. However, communication only appears to occur because of arbitrary community determinations about what word means x or y.
2007-09-16
17:24:18
·
4 answers
·
asked by
sokrates
4
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
For the record, I am not saying that words can't be defined. My position is that any definition pretty much can be called into question because definition seem to be question begging, in some ways. Whether we're trying to define art or love, human language and speech appear to be inadequate to the task.
2007-09-17
08:37:56 ·
update #1