For Pro-Lifers who voted for Bush, if you knew how many people would die worldwide because he was elected...?

Question

...would you have still voted the same way?

I am merely wondering if you hold all LIFE to the same standarad. You believe life begins at conception, correct? You believe that taking another life is murder, correct? How would you differentiate between the death of a 4 year old Iraqi child from that of an aborted child of incest in Canada? And if a pregnant 20 year old Afghani woman is killed by a roadside bomb, and she and her unborn child both die, does only that unborn child's life matter to you?

Answer 1

silly you. of course "pro-lifers" who voted for GW aren't sorry they did. GW just invades countries. he does not perform abortions. besides, don't you know that fetuses have a right to life but Iraqis do not? Iraqis are Muslims, after all and ALL Muslims are potential terrorists and are therefore guilty of attacking America on 9/11 so it's necessary that they be killed, even the little baby Muslims.

only dumby libruls can't see the difference between murdering a zygote and eradicating future terrorists .

PS. seriously. note how none of these so called "pro lifers" address the fact that 100s of thousands of innocent civilians, including infants and children have been maimed and killed and millions are now living as desperate refugees thanks to GW's oil grab in Iraq. they don't hold GW accountable for the death and destruction his disastrous foreign policies have caused and they avoid, like the plague, their own culpability for the horrible suffering they support when they support the Bush admin.

i wonder if Jesus will find their little avoid dance convincing.

Answer 2

Based on the mass graves found in Iraq the past few years, I wonder how many people have not died because President Bush acted as he has. Yes, I would still have voted for him, and wish I could again.

Answer 3

Your argument holds no water . You surmise that because people died then that somehow is his fault , rather than address why they died or why they chose radical islam and died . Wrong is wrong and right is right . And it doesn't matter what the consequences are if a whole bunch of people are wrong .
Nice try young lady .

EDIT **- BTW after reading the ridiculous uninformed answer above me , I blocked that girl . I have no time for people who choose blind hatred over rationale . And WE have no time for people like that either .
You are not blocked . I'll be watching to see if you are rational enough to consider the facts .
Listen young lady , posting blind hatred posts does no good for our country . Make a point , have an opinion , but comparing abortion to deaths in a war that we were attacked in the beginning anyway is foolishness .

Answer 4

<> Because the traditional Republican is professional-existence. <> It's NEVER "dull" to undertaking an ethical injustice. <> No, it is not. Abortion is alive and good. And with it, so are folks who crusade towards it. <> It's no longer that they do not care. It's simply that it is particularly elaborate to "overturn" a Supreme Court resolution. <> No, it is not. It's alive and good. <> Merely being devout does no longer make one a "nutjob". <> Are you no longer accustomed to the time period, and method, of "biding one's time"? Abortion did not come to be authorized in a single day. It's no longer going to come to be unlawful in a single day. Basically, professional-lifers need to wait till the Supreme Court is revisited by way of the abortion predicament. It will need to be a authorized predicament distinctive than the only dominated on in Roe-v-Wade. The desire is that the Supreme Court regulations towards abortion in this sort of case. It's just a topic of time earlier than it occurs. It would be subsequent 12 months. It would be 100 years from now. The factor is, the professional-existence motion goes to stay equipped till that day comes, each time it comes.

Answer 5

How many people died at the hands of saddam?

How many people died at the hands of kim eel of North Korea?

How many people were saved in Africa by running the corrupt President Taylor out of office without firing a shot?

How many people were saved when Libya turned over its nuke program?

How many people were saved when the US was the first on the scene with aid after "The Tsunami"?

Etc....

How many people died because Clinton did not kill bin laden the many times he had a chance?

How many people died in Iraq because Clinton allowed saddam to keep filling mass graves?

How many people died because Clinton cut our intel and military forces which allowed 9/11 to occur?

How many people died at the hands of the taliban during Clinton's watch?

Etc.....

Answer 6

If you knew that 50,000,000 babies have been murdered since Roe vs Wade would you still support it. In the 4.5 years of the Iraq War the US has lost 3,700 soldiers, we lose about that same amount everyday due to abortion (135 million per year)

But to answer your question, YES I would have still voted the exact same way.

Ever stop to think that no aborted baby is PRO CHOICE

Answer 7

Without a doubt I would...you're confusing issues there dearie. The president has laid to waste thousands of those who would have killed Americans through treachery and misguided theology...you're debating the similarities regarding killing an unborn fetus due to personal irresponsibility, laziness or confusing abortion as a reasonable means of contraception in leau of self accountability...there's a distinct difference.

Answer 8

For those who think people died because of George Bush and not radical Islam and terrible dictators that wanted to continue threatening us (Saddam) its sad you are so mixed up. The deaths of our blessed soldiers, those innocents who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan are not blood on George Bush's hands. We would not have gone to war if not attacked, we would not have gone to war in Iraq had Saddam cooperated with the international community and stopped threatening most everyone that is decent. Its sickening you blame those deaths on George Bush and compare them to innocent children killed by women who want birth control over giving a child life.

Answer 9

I don't know if you can put your tiny little brain around this or not but I will try anyway. People did not die because George Bush was elected President, people died because al queda decided to fly planes into two of the biggest office buildings in the world, killing over 3000 people in a few minutes. These people have pledged to kill as many of us as possible and if we did not send trained soldiers to fight them there then they would be coming here to kill more of us, while we are at work, or sitting home running off at the mouth on yahoo answers or what ever. So please do a little tiny bit of home work and figure things out for yourself, instead of listening to your liberal lying teachers or who ever is telling you these lies.

Answer 10

They'll just parrot the mantra that casualties are expected in war and that it's OK in war because massacres caused by dropping bombs in civilian areas are "unintentional" and "collateral damage."