what is your opinion of mark furhman the convicted felon?

Question

he is on fox news giving his opinion ..

mark furhman use the word ****** and lied and said he had not. he was convicted of perjury because of this

florida gal he was tried and convicted of this charge.

it is far more serious of a cop to be convicted of a felony charge then it is to be found guilty in a civil trial.

if oj was acquited then he is not guilty of being a double murder at all.
I was not there, were you?
michael baden says there were two people involved. what is your opinion of that?

mark furhman pled n/c in 1996 to a felony count of perjury in tht oj simpson case when he denied using a certain word .
in 1995 FFurhman allegedly assaulted a photographer for the Spoken Review. He allegedly hit mr mccomb with a steel briefcase and tore his shirt.

stuart, no, i bellieve an officer of the law should be above purjery. compared to someone being tried in a civil (for money) suit.

thanks everyone for your response .by the way i am not a left wing..and please forgive the spelling .

Answer 1

He is/was a racist that pretty much thru the Simpson case into the toilet by lying about being a racist. he has done some good things since...but I dont care for his type!

Answer 2

Like you, he didn't use his head and blurted something out, like you. Without the facts. Like your doing. 'Nough said?

Fact: Mark Furman was one of the lead detectives the was the leading investigator in the O.J. Simpson murder trial. Years before he used the "n" word and was caught with his "pants down" you could say, it was on a news tape, that's the story.

He did nothing else. As for these others that are answering, do they have the facts, I think not. It was the "Dream team" hired by O.J. that crashed the case and crucified the crime lab, the police department and the detectives. To say Mark did it all would be unfair, Judge Ito let the Dream Team get away with a travesty of justice. The trial was rated as one of the worst trials for a murder in the United States and judge Ito retired soon after, his wife I believe is still the Chief of police in L.A.

Mark retired and went to Washington State, he became an electrician then to Florida where he became an investigator and opened up the case of the Kennedy killing in Washington and, wrote a book about it, bringing the cousin of the Kennedy's to justice after twenty five years.
Mark now works for a cold case unit bringing cold case justice to people.

By the way, he was never a "convicted felon" and he was never convicted of "lying" to a jury. Nothing was ever proven of him in the O.J. case. He quit his job, he wasn't fired. They made such a circus out of it he got sick of it and quit. The other detective transfer out.

Answer 3

Fox and felony go together, haven't you noticed.
G Gordon Liddie, Ollie North, now Mark , plant some evidence, Furhman, fellons are drawn to fox like flies to a puss filled wound. Of course Furhman is a hero to right wing anti constitution nuts, but its important to remember that it was largely because of his planting of false evidence that OJ didn't get the juice.

Answer 4

Mark Furhman is not a convicted felon. He was an investigating officer in the O.J. Simpson investigation when Simpson was charged with the brutal murder of his wife and her friend. Mark Furhman found incriminating evidence against O.J. but his testimony was torn down by lies created by O.J.'s defense attorney.

Answer 5

He is smart, a very good detective, intuitive, impeccably groomed. He is on Fox because he has been invited many times to be on the show. There are people who want to hear what he has to say. When he speaks, he is a no nonsense, get to the point speaker. He doesn't compete with the other guests for his minutes of air time. He waits his turn, and then succinctly delivers his opinion. In addition, he is HOT! He is probably hotter now, than he was in 1994, and he was hot then! He is very opinionated, and backs his opininions with many first hand experiences. I like him. He makes sense when he talks.

Answer 6

There are two dead, at least two lives ruined, lawyers have gotten rich, district attorneys made to look incompetent, the news "manufacturing media" stayed busy for months, (cramming used toilet paper down everyone's throat), hell, that "trial" lasted for 5 to 7 months and had a bigger following than the moronic soap-opera's( about the only good thing that can be said).
Mark Furhman?? He was just trying to make it "big time" and screwed up, just about everyone and everything!!!!!!!!!!
toro gringo

Answer 7

I'd rather be his friend than OJ, the convicted "Double Murderer"

And by convicted, I speak to his being found liable in Civil Court for the death of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson.

The very reason he now must resort to armed robbery to make a living!

EDIT: Mary, are you really saying that it was worse for Mark Fuhrman to lie about saying a word, than it was to slice the throats of two human beings?

What kind of lunatic left winger are you?

Don't forget to wash your #7 Jersey before you go to work tonight.

Answer 8

What was he convicted of? I know he was the detective who had something to do with the infamous glove in the OJ Simpson trial. Then I thought he retired and moved to Utah or some state in that area.

Answer 9

From what I have seen of Mark, I think he has the best intrest of our justice system, I am proud of Mark for standing up to the giant media propaganda machine. He has told the truth. Lawyers for O. J. where the best money could buy, the DA was out gunned, I don't think Mark planted anything. I think the jury was a pack of easily manipulated morons. Mark is a stand up guy, who could watch my kids any time, would you trust your kids with O.J.?

Answer 10

i assume it definitely relies upon if the device is geared in direction of punishment or rehabilitation. i in my opinion do no longer have confidence grudges must be held in perpetuity the two by ability of individuals or by ability of the state, yet our civilisations have an obligation to guard us nether the fewer. There are some people who're mentally unwell who can in no way be depended directly to function in society. Pedophiles are probable the main usually suggested team right here, yet there are countless others who're criminally maladjusted and can't ever be estimated to play any place unobserved. it style of feels that the government in Australia ruled initially that this guy did no longer fall into this classification. Did the guy in this tale deserve his treatment on the palms of the Queensland government? Hm, i do no longer think of he did. He served his reformatory sentence and paid the fee that society demanded of him. as long as he did no longer have costs marvelous, i will't see any reason to disclaim him an award for his actual act of braveness. I too think of it sends an extremely unfavorable sign. in case you do something incorrect in existence - then you definately isn't forgiven. that's style of too very such as the Christian view of going to hell for eternity in basic terms for no longer believing interior the appropriate sky daddy. If I have been an ex-con and that i knew I confronted an entire life of impenetrable social stigma, then i could return to offending because of the fact there is not any ingredient enjoying by ability of the regulations. What he did till now his penal complex sentence became into undesirable. If it have been as much as me i think of he ought to have been sent away for longer, yet i don't be attentive to his case info so won't 2d wager his jury. yet he has been punished for those movements. If the government incredibly believed in that's very own court device adequate to settle for that he were punished precise the 1st time around then it has no excuse to punish him lower back right here. My opinion besides.