Isn't it quite a conflict of interest for Al Gore to be profiting from carbon credit trading when he is the one promoting the big global warming hoax?
2007-09-16 15:54:30 · 10 answers · asked by Alan B 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I was just watching the Discovery Channel last night, and apparently 150 million years ago there was a huge climate change that made once plush and lush rain forest type terrain deserts and led to the extinction of over one million different species. Why wasn't Al there? Selling his carbon credits? That had to have been man made global warming, right? It makes me so sad, knowing we could have stopped that man made global warming back then, if only Fred and Barney had listened.
2007-09-16 16:15:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It should also bother LIBS that Al Gore runs a multi-billion dollar investment company that invests in "green" technology stocks. Mind you- they don't invest in the technology- they invest in the stocks. In Al Gore's twisted little mind money is the end game- even if it takes an alarmist approach to get it. The only satisfying thing is that no one will ever remember Al Gore years from now. History does not keep records of figures that professed false science. How many scientists can you name that advised that the earth is not round but rather flat? The same will hold true of Al Gore's global warming scam.
2016-05-21 06:19:54 · answer #2 · answered by verdie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The thing is the whole idea of carbon credit trading is to create a profit incentive for conservation. Social change only happens when the big boys can make money from it.
2007-09-16 16:04:06 · answer #3 · answered by ash 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Regardless of your personal opinion on global warming, Al Gore has been working on the issue for several decades and knows a lot more about it than you do. (As a scientist, I can tell you that the evidence is strongly in favor of it) Since he clearly believes in the existence of global warming, it makes a lot of sense that he would invest in things designed to counter it.
2007-09-16 16:04:05 · answer #4 · answered by William S 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nice! We will be made to drive POS cars to satisfy the great Al while he continues to drive his suv and fly around in his private jet
2007-09-16 16:01:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Attacking the messenger is a time-tested way to assail a message that we do not want to hear.
2007-09-16 16:08:21 · answer #6 · answered by Mister J 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes, but the cons actually want this too, even thought they'd never admit it. Stealing more from us in taxes and making us conserve more means they can have more wars and have more oil and energy.
2007-09-16 16:00:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
This question is useless without links.
2007-09-16 16:04:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Chenay and Halliburton are the profiteers-please get over your dumb self!
2007-09-16 16:01:32 · answer #9 · answered by sally sue 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
insane poster alert.
2007-09-16 15:59:17 · answer #10 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋