oj simpson trusted her and now she is on the oposite side? she knows what I am talking about.
2007-09-16 15:41:26 · 8 answers · asked by mary 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
DURING HIS TRIAL SHE WAS ON HIS SIDE AND NOW BECAUSE HE IS ARRESTED AGAIN SHE IS AGAINST HIM. I HAVE HEARD HER SAY SOME VERY DAMAGING THINGS TONIGHT ON FOX NEWS.
2007-09-16 16:02:55 · update #1
DURING HIS TRIAL SHE WAS ON HIS SIDE AND NOW BECAUSE HE IS ARRESTED AGAIN SHE IS AGAINST HIM. I HAVE HEARD HER SAY SOME VERY DAMAGING THINGS TONIGHT ON FOX NEWS.
2007-09-16 16:02:56 · update #2
AFTER WORKING WITH MY HUSBAND, A DEFENSE ATTORNEY I AM VERY CONCERNED ABOUT AN ATTORNEY THAT SELLS OUT .
2007-09-16 16:20:37 · update #3
WHEN YOU TRUST AN ATTORNEY THEN YOU KEEP THINGS IN THE VAULT,
A GOOD ATTORNEY IS ONE THAT KEEPS HIS MOUTH SHUT INSTEAD OF SELLING OUT HIS INTEGRITY.
2007-09-16 16:25:26 · update #4
i have always liked greta but something is definitely different'
my husband was an attorney and i worked in his law office for years.fyi
2007-09-17 08:30:12 · update #5
Like I said earlier tonight "A journalist will sell their own mother out for a 'juicy' story".
You can never trust a journalist and as far as I'm concerned, Greta never gets to the meat of a case; she dances around it just to seem neutral but you can never trust her.
Attorneys and jouralists walk a tight line --- one in harmony, hand-in-hand with one another. Only a fuzzy line separates the two professions.
They are both sell outs.
2007-09-16 16:00:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not sure what you are referring to but Greta is a good attorney. So what if OJ trusted her or anyone else? He is a real piece of work. Right is right. Wrong is wrong. I don't know how defense attorney's can live with themselves defending somone who is guilty anyway?... A change of conscience is refreshing to me. Get a Law degree and see what it is all about before you cast stones upon her or anyone else.
2007-09-16 22:55:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is now a news reporter and she has only the facts as they appear to the media. If she sees that it appears like there was a crime committed then it is her job as a legal expert to point it out. If she sees evidence that he is being wrongly accused then she will say so and give reasons why she thinks this way. She may also be plating devils advocate you know having on people who swear OJ is innocent and she is asking tough questions and seeing how they respond and if they can back up their statement's with facts.
2007-09-16 22:53:00 · answer #3 · answered by Prof. Dave 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sell out ???
Attorney???
News Media???
Defense Atty.???
Future politician???
Next national election,(2010), she will probably be running for Senator or Representative from some state in the North East !!!! She now has the qualifications to be a typical politician!!!
toro gringo
2007-09-17 10:35:14 · answer #4 · answered by NONAME 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She WORKED for Headline news during the OJ trial...She was SUPPOSE to give commentary for the defence side on her show!
Now she works for FOX news and her show profiles VICTIMS of crimes like Natalie Halloways Mom,!
She changed jobs she didnt sell out!!!!!!
2007-09-17 00:10:16 · answer #5 · answered by roxie_29812 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She works, for the fair and balanced Fox 5, that is why.
2007-09-16 22:54:20 · answer #6 · answered by That one 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe she's had some time to think about it. Maybe she has developed some standards.
2007-09-16 23:19:34 · answer #7 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe she finally realised that criminals are not all set up by the cops.
2007-09-16 22:48:25 · answer #8 · answered by jerseydevil67 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋