He couldn't have - and he didn't have.
2007-09-16 16:02:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I saw that same documentary about Tut's knee injury and it made sense. If there was ever a knife involved and I really don't think this is true it wouldn't have been made from steel it would have been made from gold or silver at that time in history.
2007-09-16 22:24:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Granny in KS 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The last documentary I saw about Tut said he'd suffered a severe injury to his knee -- so bad, his knee cap was completely gone. It's thought he lived a few days after the injury, because the bone surrounding the fracture showed signs of reacting to the injury. He probably succumbed to infection. He wasn't murdered -- the "fragments of bone" seen in earlier x-rays were explained by Dr. Zahi Hawass as nothing more than a result of the mummification process.
Anna Banana, if you're an Egyptology major, you should know that name.
2007-09-16 22:16:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Resident Heretic 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Quite likely any reference to a steel knife is fictional anyway. But also, many people really don't acknowledge or even know there is a difference between and iron blade and steel.
2007-09-17 00:53:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by rohak1212 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe there were one or two IRON artefacts in his tomb. It was still a very rare metal, and probably came from a meteorite.
2007-09-17 07:26:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm an Egyptologist major and they cannot prove that. They now think he was bluggend to death. Broken skull pieces in the back of his head prove that too.
2007-09-16 22:10:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anna Banana 1
·
4⤊
1⤋
Never heard that one before.
2007-09-16 22:10:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Emily Dew 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Where, may I ask, did you hear of this fairy tale?
2007-09-16 22:14:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chris B 7
·
2⤊
0⤋