The "so called scientists" have determined that eating less meat will reduce global warming. How much more insane can they really get. They now claim that eating less meat will cause the animal population to decrease and therefore reduce the methane gas output from the animals. What's next killing our first born? Oh that's right you liberals are already doing enough of that through abortion. Hey maybe you can apply that toward your carbon credits. LOL!
2007-09-16 15:01:57 · 11 answers · asked by citizenvnfla 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Robin, that's not what they reported. they simply said that eating less meat would decrease the animal population through demand. Nothing about oil. You liberals just don't get it.
2007-09-16 15:35:30 · update #1
Man, these people got it all figured out, ain't they ? COWS cause methane. The more COWS we eat, the less methane. In case them wise scientists ain't figured it out yet, THEM COWS IS MEAT ! ! !
2007-09-16 15:08:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually robin hood, the scientists claim the methane (farts) from cows is the biggest contributor to CO2 in the atmosphere.
Another ridiculous claim by some scientists and evironmentalist nut jobs, is to now drive more and walk or bike less. They claim, all the water and food we'd have to consume for energy to bike/walk and all the pollution and carbon consumed and released to get that food (harvesting, feeding livestock, transporting etc.) is more harmful in the long run than driving and burning fossil fuels. Seems pretty ridiculous to me. These environmentalist wackos would rather humans almost go extinct and have us revert back to living in mud huts in order to save the so called 'Doomed and ailing mother earth'!
2007-09-16 15:17:13 · answer #2 · answered by Ninja Rabbit 007 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I never did believe in Global Warming. This is so weird that it makes the "Theory" of GW sound even more stupid and unreal!
I think I'll go have a hamburger for dinner!
2007-09-16 15:31:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Methane gas...Thought sounds like good stuff...You see these dumps burning off methane? I sure could cut the cost off my electric bill if i could tap into that source.
The problem isn't liberal or conservative....We are all to blame! I use hydrogen in my cars and have doubled the savings of fuel! What have you done? I see a lot complaining about the problem, but they still make 32/36mpg...Wake up to easy alternatives
Peace :)
2007-09-16 15:18:12 · answer #4 · answered by done 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yeah, it's funny how psycho environmentalists and vegetarians are the forefront of this research. I have to admit I like the Moose belching story.
2007-09-17 04:46:01 · answer #5 · answered by Bleh! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Funny how they never mention that the largest greenhouse gas in the world is water vapor. It makes up probably 100 times the CO2 and CH4 in the atmoshpere.
2007-09-16 15:18:54 · answer #6 · answered by WCSteel 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Actually, I think it's about time that farting be made into a political issue. Politicians have been waffling on the fence for far too long on this issue already.
2007-09-16 15:14:17 · answer #7 · answered by Patriotic Libertarian 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It would also cause more illness and disease - another plus for the pharmaceutical industry!
2007-09-17 05:29:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I heard about that. Stupid is putting it lightly. Must be the reason behind the elite's desire for population reduction.
2007-09-16 15:14:28 · answer #9 · answered by Fedup Veteran 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You ain't seen nothing yet.
2007-09-16 15:11:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋