English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

People kept saying Bill Belichick is the Vince Lombardi of our time. Little did they know about video camera scandals of Bill Belichick. Winning three superbowls by cheating, it's disgusting isn't it?

2007-09-16 14:23:36 · 14 answers · asked by . 4 in Sports Football (American)

14 answers

He is a good coach - unfortunately for cheaters - you never know what they WOULD have been without cheating. The Patriots and Billy boy are now in that group.

Like Baroid and many others - cheaters are scorned and looked down upon.

He will never be in a class with Lombardi, Noll, Walsh now - regardless what he does.

2007-09-16 14:30:38 · answer #1 · answered by vegasrob89118 6 · 0 3

I have to say yes, because that would be 50 extra yards that Peyton Manning would have had to march down the field. It is extremely rare that a team would go for it so deep in its own end. The problem is that Belichick didn't have a timeout to challenge the spot. Had the Patriots made it (the spot could have been challenged had the Pats not wasted a timeout just before the play), then the Colts would have not gotten the ball back until there was about 27 seconds on the clock left.

2016-05-21 05:36:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

He coaches next door to ESPN, which crams everything from Boston and New York down the rest of the country's throat.
"Is Tom Brady the best of all time?" "Is Bill Bilichick the greatest coach of all time?" etc.

2007-09-16 14:36:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Cheaters or not, they are (currently) proving themselves to be one of the best football teams in the leaguge! Sure cheating is bad...why do it when your team is packed with talent...they'll soon show everyone what they can really bring to the table...and that's more wins and more championship rings in the future!**Go Patriots!**

2007-09-16 14:37:09 · answer #4 · answered by queenitra00 2 · 2 1

Its funny that you think they only won because they cheated. Are you watching the game now...24-0 before halftime. They shouldn't have done it...because they don't need it!

2007-09-16 14:38:27 · answer #5 · answered by shagui 2 · 2 1

ok...Pats are now up, 24-0 over the Chargers, they were intercepted twice, still in the first half, the Pats have officials on their sideline, making sure every thing is on the up and up..think it's talent, and I think it's not just the Pats...

2007-09-16 14:36:03 · answer #6 · answered by someoneelse04 4 · 1 2

He saved the cameras for Mangini...Like it or not, thats all it was...Bad blood...Get over it already...Its done...Much like the Chargers, 24-0...2nd Q

2007-09-16 14:31:31 · answer #7 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 2 2

Haha, while your crying we are watching our team kick San Diegos butt.

2007-09-16 14:32:14 · answer #8 · answered by Ballzy 6 · 2 1

He was trying to win.It's not like he distributed drugs to the team.

2007-09-16 14:30:13 · answer #9 · answered by BEJEWELED 5 · 4 1

he is a cheater, just like the broncos were tonight...if u watched the game in OT. u would know what I was talking about.

2007-09-16 14:34:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers