English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

yes

2007-09-16 13:16:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I am sure that I am going to be 'labeled' here however, this is my personal opinion - but you asked a question and I would like to give you an intelligent response AND provide the reason that I don't watch this particular television show.

Since 1986, nonwhite actors have received only 51 nominations out of 840 possible slots in the top four acting categories for drama and comedy. They've won only seven times: Andre Braugher in 1998 for "Homicide," Hector Elizondo in 1997 for "Chicago Hope," Mary Alice in 1993 for "I'll Fly Away," James Earl Jones and Madge Sinclair in 1991 for "Gabriel's Fire," Jimmy Smits in 1990 for "L.A. Law" and Jackee Harry in 1987 for "227."

"Other than a few standouts here or there, Emmy doesn't pay attention to black people," says Eric Deggans, TV critic and columnist for the St. Petersburg Times. "If Andre does a guest spot on 'Law & Order,' he'll get a nomination, but if another actor of color does incredible work, Emmy won't even notice. In fact, the actress that stars in "Ugly Betty" has an opportunity to be the first Latino to not only be nominated, but possibly win.

It is difficult for me to continue to support this genre when so many qualified, quality actors and actresses are left out each and every year - and I question the way this operation is handled.

That's just my opinion.

2007-09-16 13:27:53 · answer #2 · answered by THE SINGER 7 · 0 0

Are you helpful it became right into a failure? OR, are you hoping it became right into a failure because of the fact you rolled your eyes which shows which you probably did no longer like the shaggy dog tale? In my adventure, Tea Partiers are no longer a sturdy choose of analyzing human beings's social cues as a results of their regular loss of an empathetic reaction. that's evidenced by ability of a few of their regulations on the subject of "entitlements" and the anger that they bestow upon those much less fortunate and the greater susceptible participants of the american society. EDIT: Thx to AJ --the definitely quote: "the former day, my daughter had a tea party together with her little friends, and it became into so cute. They complained approximately taxes, called Obama a Communist, and puzzled how the Latina youngster have been given in." Now that's humorous. of course, you haven't any experience of humour and only as suggested above won't be able to of course study social cues as i could salary a raffle that the final public of the objective audience theory it became into humorous too. yet because of the fact i'm on the west coast and it hasn't aired yet, i ought to observe--in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, perhaps no longer!!

2016-11-14 15:32:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh God no. I'd sooner watch Fox News. I wish all the celebs would experience spontaneously combustion. That would be something to watch.

2007-09-16 13:18:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hollywood maggots, thinking the world revolves around them.


Kent in SD

2007-09-16 13:16:33 · answer #5 · answered by duckgrabber 4 · 0 0

Nope. I'd rather hear all about it tomorrow. I think the show (like the oscars) is just too long

2007-09-16 13:15:53 · answer #6 · answered by Malgorzata B 4 · 0 0

No, who cares, they just made TV shows, nothing earth shattering or important to modern man.

2007-09-16 13:19:37 · answer #7 · answered by Maddy Jinx 4 · 0 0

No, I would rather watch paint dry..

2007-09-16 13:24:18 · answer #8 · answered by Ande-Lin F 3 · 0 0

i wish, but none of my family is! ive begged them to turn the channel but the wont!

2007-09-16 13:16:35 · answer #9 · answered by Margo S 2 · 0 1

shoot me with a giant laser beam.

2007-09-16 13:15:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers