Do you believe the McCanns kiled the child? Please say yes or no and give your two strongest reasons?

Question

Please note that Richard Branson has given £100,000 ($200,000) for their defense which means he believes they are innocent.

Answer 1

No I don't think they killed her, I think it was an accidental death and they covered it up.
So what if some rich guy donates a large sum of money. Money does not mean innocence. Unless of course your name is OJ Simpson.

Answer 2

Yes. Because nothing adds up and their behavior has only fuelled the doubt already there and because they are more upset about proving their innocence than finding the truth..... (Speaks volumes) As for Richard Branson as nice as he might seem, he obviously hasn't lived in the 'real world'... If he can hand money over that easily than it's a pity it didn't go to a worthy cause like starving children in Africa..........

Answer 3

Richard Branson is no fool, unlike the anti Mccanns who already believe and in some cases, even hope, that Maddie is dead so they can say afterwords "told you so"My message to everyone would be keep looking and stop writing. Some missing children have been found years after their abduction

Answer 4

No, the sleeping meds (Calpol) are mild in nature and can be 'safely' given to infants. Too, since her body has yet to be found, a lethal dose can only be determined by an autopsy. I really feel that the McCanns are innocent. The media and public opinion are crucifying them before all the facts are in. I've said this before and I'll say it again: This story is very much like the one that took place in Australia in August of 1980. Remember the movie Cry in the Dark about the disappearance and presumed death of Azaria Chamberlain, a ten-week-old baby girl who went missing from a campground near Uluru/Ayers Rock? The mother was found guilty of the crime (by the media and in public opinion LONG BEFORE the actual trial ). She was sent to prison to serve hard-time. Years later, she was exonerated when evidence finally showed that a dingo had swiped the baby--just as the mother had said from the very beginning. Her only crime was leaving the baby unattended inside their tent for just a few minutes.
I hope that the McCann's are not put through additional and unnecessary hell, only to find that they are innocent victims of a deplorable crime.

Answer 5

Richard Branson seems to think this is some sort of PR stunt. He should be an opportunist elsewhere. The fact is that these people abandoned their children to go out for a meal. That is child neglect. They are unfit parents, and they are capitalising out of this whole story. The saddest part of it is that a poor little girl is gone. She is the victim....not her disgraceful parents.

Answer 6

who knows, all the reports on this case are lies, the real truth is supposed to be released for the public sometime next week, I have alwas thought it was an accidental overdose, then a coverup, but I really don't know now. They have said it wasn't her DNA found in that car they rented.

Answer 7

You have to say no. Innocent until proven guilty. But there is something very fishy about the whole affair.

Answer 8

'Please note that Richard Branson has given £100,000 ($200,000) for their defense which means he believes they are innocent.'

Just to be clear, is this supposed to make us believe they are innocent?

Answer 9

Yes

1) they have always used sedatives to make their children sleep
2) DNA doesn't lie

Answer 10

Murder no. Child neglect yes.
Reason being of the articles I have read. No one reason.