English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

43 answers

I would love to live in a small town. It would be so awesome to be able to have a house and be able to go outside and see a yard, or some kind of land. I'd love to actually see stars at night and hear a rooster crow to wake me up in the morning (though I'd most likely be awake before the rooster, but still). I'd love to hear quiet or the sounds of other animals or nature (rather than obnoxious noises of the city) I would love to be able to drive and see open road and not bumber to bumper traffic all of the time. (I guess it's convenient to be able to put on make up while driving because you are sitting still, but actually driving is better). It would be nice not to be in a rush all of the time (though I'm not sure what that's like) and to be able to just relax and forget the time every now and then. It would also be great to be able to just go outside and walk or run freely without being bothered or having to be cautious.

I don't know what city is like that?

2007-09-16 10:46:41 · answer #1 · answered by Consuming Fire 7 · 3 0

New York City

2007-09-16 14:55:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

New York City.

2007-09-22 15:57:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The places I've loved visiting the most were San Diego and Honolulu. I don't know whether I would love to live in Hawaii, but it was so much fun to visit that I really thought about whether I could live there. I might be able to.
San Diego is a really wonderful place that I could really love to live there.

In both cases, though, there is one major factor that would prevent me from living in either place. They both are too far from my various family members. I live within a few hours of my kids and my mother and grandmother, and I wouldn't choose to be farther away from the people I love.

2007-09-17 00:47:35 · answer #4 · answered by Larry V 5 · 0 0

Right where I live presently. In the middle of nowhere,with the closest towns from each direction being 5+ miles away,and having populations under 500.

2007-09-17 00:31:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Montclair, CA ( a small town in the SF east bay area) or somewhere right on the ocean in CA. San Francisco is the only city I would care to live in, because I love it!

2007-09-16 17:45:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well...
Arlington, VA
Seattle, WA
Maybe somewhere in New York City

2007-09-16 15:52:56 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

Amarillo Texas

2007-09-16 14:11:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Only been to Vegas and Santa Barbara, out of the two I would live in Santa Barbara...is that a city?

2007-09-16 21:17:27 · answer #9 · answered by Tilly_Mint 3 · 0 0

There are literally greater public (study freeloader) centers attainable in cities...a brilliant form of the individuals on welfare additionally get loose or decreased public housing and nutrition stamps...it creates a lazy underclass it fairly is satisfied with basically living off the traditional public dole. interior the agricultural areas you mostly ought to take own duty on your individual welfare.

2016-10-20 01:17:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers