They say what goes around, comes around. And if what he was charged with in 1994 really did happen, then karma could be coming back up on him. He was arrested Thursday for armed robbery. Other serious felony charges are expected to be filed. He and six other men were arrested. O.J Simpson came out with that ridculous book about if he did murder his wife and her friend Ron Goldman, then that would be how he would have done it. That was such a heartless thing to write about. Something is really wrong with this man.
2007-09-16 10:00:50 · 15 answers · asked by ashleigh2501 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Hey Goat-Im responding to your comment. I dont think their would have been rioting. Even during the time period in which the murder case was in court, because their was black people just like today, who said and is still saying that O.J was guilty. So even they know it. Mostly Everybody was saying he was guilty. And if the jury was afraid of a backlash, than they should have been afraid of the racist whites reaction when he was found not guilty. So that could have gone either way.
2007-09-17 15:10:32 · update #1
I don't think he was arrested on Thursday, but believe he was questioned by police. He was just arrested today, Sunday, at about 12:00 pm....Ya, I think there may be a little 'karma' and now truly believe that he thinks he is invincible...Enough is enough OJ...give it up....you don't know how lucky you are to totally get away with MURDER!!
2007-09-16 10:05:03 · answer #1 · answered by TT01 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
These are my opinions....nothing else.
I believe that the jury who found him not guilty in the murder case actually had enough evidence to declare him guilty.
However, they may have feared for their own lives, and may have felt that looting and burning throughout the nation would occur if a guilty verdict was returned.
Look at what happened in Memphis in 1968 when Martin Luther King was assassinated and in Los Angeles in 1992 with the Rodney King situation. So, there is a basis for such fear.
It makes absolutely no sense that he was found not guilty in the criminal case, while he was found guilty in the civil case. To me, that represents a breakdown in our legal system.
It's a shame that the majority of the U.S. population has to live in fear of declaring certain people guilty when crimes are committed. Those who loot and burn when the legal system outcome doesn't suit them should be treated like the low life animals that they are.
To more directly answer your question, all we can do is hope that he gets what he deserves if he did what he's accused of and that there will be no fear in declaring him guilty in such case.
2007-09-17 00:21:45 · answer #2 · answered by Goat 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think since his book was a sort of emotional confessional, or at least that's what critics of criminal defense made it out to be, and the fact that his rights to the book were stolen from him probably made him act out and the result you see is a man frustrated and ultimately being possibly facing a majority stare of accusations that will instill a strong belief he had to have committed the original crime. I mean is the glove don't fit, acquit just does'nt cut it. Well unless they had expert orthopethics, butchers, and brute strenght/hand to eye coordination experts that testified that he could not simply have put on a smaller glove, committed the crime and since no prints were left acquired a seemingly airtight defense.
Well if he indeed bought out a defense then the fact he was found not guilty may have allowed greater criminals to commit larger crimes pursuant to the methodology of all those questionable cases that have been floating around from station to station.
2007-09-17 09:26:11 · answer #3 · answered by just curious 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes OJ did get off the murder charge but as it has been proved many times in the past jurors make mistakes. Sometimes they convict an innocent man and sometimes let off a guilty one. In my opinion they made a mistake in the case of OJ. All the facts including DNA point to a guilty man. It will be interesting to see if he can also get of the armed robbery charge.Personally I hope he gets life. He deserves it.
2007-09-16 10:36:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Out of all the murders where ppl who were considered guilty got off.... why are ppl so obsessed with the ones of Nicole Simpson & Ron Goldman? There are still unsolved murders from the 60's & 70's where ppl were being killed because they were trying to attain their civil rights....yet ppl have never been this engrossed with seeing "justice" meted out. How strange.
2007-09-17 21:45:33 · answer #5 · answered by NativeAtlantean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
karma caught up to him a long time ago -- the man is a wreck. his whole family is bankrupt -- in case you missed the rest of the story while he was in nevada he was supposed to be at his daughters bankruptcy hearing.
the book is going to pay the goldmans -- cashing in on the death of your son seems a little heartless to me too.
2007-09-16 10:17:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think OJ went back and treatened to kill the main accuser and the main accuser wants the case dropped. I think OJ threatened him. I think oj will get way with this one too. I only hope for justice in the afterlife.
2007-09-16 11:16:01 · answer #7 · answered by stick man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He was arrested on Sunday, September 16th. A calendar might help you in your legal analysis.
2007-09-16 13:09:04 · answer #8 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets hope karma has finally caught up with him and the rest will catch up with him when he goes to hell.
2007-09-16 10:04:47 · answer #9 · answered by 80'srock 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was found inocent in a court of law by a jury of his peers.
2007-09-16 10:07:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋