English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All of the evidence convinces me that OJ is guilty of those murders.

2007-09-16 09:49:22 · 7 answers · asked by Miss K 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

7 answers

I completely agree with you but a jury has to vote him guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Meaning that even if one person were to vote him innocent then he's innocent. So now matter what we think there was probably one stupid person who held out and kept him innocent.

2007-09-16 09:54:03 · answer #1 · answered by Beautiful Disaster 2 · 0 0

What makes me think that he is guilty? In my mind many things, first of all being the evidence that I think points to him, especially the blood in the bronco; running does not look good either Mister Simpson. Another thing was all his alibis he said he was sleeping, golfing and then said he was out of town. Perhaps he was sleeping while he was golfing out of town. For me the most convincing thing is where is the murderer? If I or any reasonable sane person was put on trial for the murder of their children's mother and found not guilty, when it was all over you can be damn sure that one would exhaust all their resources and their last breath to find the real killer. A sane and reasonable person wants justice for a loved one that has been murdered right? OJ why are you not searching for who really did it? The truth why he is not looking because he does not have to go very far OJ he simply has to look in the mirror. UGH! This case still makes my blood boil!

2007-09-17 12:59:40 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. O.C.D. 1 · 0 0

I am not sure if O.J. Simpson is either Guilty or Innocent. In some ways I do believe he committed the murders and at other times I do not believe he committed the murders.

The reason I believe he could have committed the murders is because during the night of the murder, he kept making up alibis about where he was. He says he was sleeping, golfing, and was going out of town. Simpsons has so many stories that it is unclear what he did that night.

The reason I believe he could have not committed the murders is because during the trial he (in my opinion) felt sad about what happened and he showed concern about the future of his children growing up without a mother.

To this day, many believe that Simpson is GUILTY of murder. In my opinion, I have a feeling that the jury voted not guilty over guilty because the trial went longer than expected, and if the jury had voted GUILTY, the jurors would have had to face scrutiney for years to come. If the Simpson murder trial was less than three months, I believe the juror would have probably found Simpson Guilty but since the trial went longer than expected, I believe the jurors made their decision because they wanted the trial to end.

2007-09-16 17:05:37 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 · 0 1

DNA.
Guess the Dream Team defense won't rush to defend him now for theft charges.

2007-09-16 16:59:56 · answer #4 · answered by NoAmnesty4U 3 · 0 0

I agree, he got away with murder.

2007-09-16 16:55:14 · answer #5 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 2 0

Because a criminal court said he was not guilty.




I know- I don't like it either.

2007-09-16 20:44:36 · answer #6 · answered by sirbobby98121 7 · 0 0

Who else could/would have done it?

2007-09-16 16:59:38 · answer #7 · answered by Natalie O 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers