2007-09-16 09:45:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Way too early. The circumstances facing the country could change radically by the time of the election. I think they wasted a lot of money.
2007-09-16 09:57:41 · answer #1 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Too early and too many candidates. At least 80% of the people running in either primary are morons and know they don't stand a chance yet they remain in the running for whatever reason.
2007-09-16 16:49:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's not even 2008 yet! i think Yes!!!
I don't like any of nominees, they all sound the same appealing to public! all the time, need a better canidate like
past!
Clinton is good? Mccain a wind bag? The mayor should drop out! and all the govenors too!!
The guy from new mexico sound the "Best"???
2007-09-16 17:04:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely.
I have a crazy idea-by the time the conventions in 2008 roll around, people will be sick of seeing these candidates over and over and over and over and over and over ( get the idea) and one of the parties will roll out a candidate that up until that time, few people will have been aware of him. He will show us some fresh idea, and become the next president.
2007-09-16 17:15:21 · answer #4 · answered by Barry auh2o 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Far too early but that is the world we live in- one with far too many power hungry fools that think we really need to hear from them.
This old man once told me " when you start thinking they cant do it without you, you've been their too long"
2007-09-16 17:19:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes - and has been said - we know some of the candidates have no chance.
2007-09-16 17:08:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Keep your pants on, the B*TCH is coming, the B*TCH is coming!
2007-09-16 16:49:50 · answer #7 · answered by Thomas Paine 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋