English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was watching ESPN this morning and they said "Don't start any Browns (for Fantasy Football)." They laughing at the sight of the Bengals and Browns Games, expecting the Bengals to beat the Browns 32-9, and they commented that the 9 points for the Browns was generous.

But now, 51-38 with the Browns winning, I think anyone could work for ESPN.

2007-09-16 09:12:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

9 answers

Just shows you how much they know. I'm getting my *** kicked because the guy I'm playing in FF has almost all Browns.

2007-09-16 09:17:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I hate the ESPN Fantasy analyses.

You know the Bengals/Browns rivalry is unpredictable. They've put up 2 of the highest scoring games in NFL history.

2007-09-17 05:45:47 · answer #2 · answered by Zack D 1 · 0 0

Hindsight is brilliant. They usually do a pretty good job. When the Browns play a team with a better defense, the story will probably be different, and you have to realize that Derek Anderson was an unknown quantity (unless you're from Oregon). I'd cut them some slack.

2007-09-16 09:19:18 · answer #3 · answered by Joshua B 2 · 0 0

The games aren't played on paper, they're played in our TVs!

Bengals D just as bad as NO O!? At least we knew the Bengals D was terrible!

2007-09-16 09:18:30 · answer #4 · answered by JimBob 6 · 0 0

it fairly is actual that extraordinarily lots all people ought to artwork for ESPN. I recommend, Joe Theismann is on the topic of the worst colour commentator ever and however the 4 letters clung to him like ants on honey. in case you have listened to ESPN radio lots considering that Dan Patrick left, you realize what kind of clowns thrive on that payroll. although, ESPN is finally no longer approximately solid activities diagnosis, they are approximately entertainment. here they have us watching each and all the time, and that they have gotten us to speak approximately them as quickly as we at the instant are not watching. So from the entertainment perspective, they have finished precisely what they needed to.

2016-10-20 01:17:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm sure you called this too. Everyone knows that Brady Quinn is a kajillion times better than Carson Palmer right?

Idiot.

2007-09-16 09:19:58 · answer #6 · answered by Dustin B 5 · 0 2

football is just 22 dimwitted thugs pushing a ball around like a herd of bulls with their nuts tied up.

Every minute spent watching football is 6 million dead brain cells and precious time lost that will NEVER be recovered.

2007-09-16 09:22:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Uh...Brady Quinn isn't even playing...Derek Anderson is...

2007-09-16 09:23:03 · answer #8 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 0 0

lmao ya.

2007-09-16 09:18:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers