2007-09-16 07:40:34 · 39 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Save the dishonest one. He can possibly be rehabilitated. Ungreatful ones just get worse and then lie to excuse their ungreatfulness. You and I have both seen this first hand.
Sharky got a cool new haircut...And he has some damn good ideas, too.
2007-09-17 07:22:25 · answer #1 · answered by Magic Mouse 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The dishonest ;
There may be a situation where one may have to put themselves at stake with dishonesty, in order to help someone/thing at that point in time.
For example) if a friend commited a foolish act, and you were there to witness it, you would be dishonest if questioned, in order to save your friend from penalty.
To a further extent, this person may even take blame for this foolish friend ; another form of dishonesty.
The dishonest are aware and conscious of the actions and reactions that are taking place around them, which is what triggers the act of dishonesty.
The ungrateful however, are unconscious of the actions/reactions around them/others. Because they are selfish they only care about themselves.
Therefore in this situation the dishonest deserve to be chosen over the ungrateful. Since the dishonest have done deeds for others, they would recognize this kind act, and show appreciation, unlike the ungrateful who would show no sign of gratitude.
2007-09-16 12:44:41 · answer #2 · answered by phoenixxgrey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would save the dishonest. The ungrateful would probably learn their lesson. They have taken everything for granted, therefore if they are about to die, they would finally become grateful, and then, I wouldn't have to save the ungrateful, I'd save the grateful, and the dishonest.
2007-09-16 07:49:21 · answer #3 · answered by zacaljul2004 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Ungrateful
2007-09-16 07:44:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If I save the Dishonest, he will probably be grateful. But if I save the Ugrateful. he will surely be ungrateful, because such is his nature. So ,to be honest, it would be selfish of me to choose to save the Dishonest for the reason that no gratitude would be forthcoming if I saved the Ungrateful instead.
2007-09-16 08:03:03 · answer #5 · answered by shades of Bruno 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dishonest
2007-09-16 07:45:42 · answer #6 · answered by B 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would save the ungrateful.. I would try save them both, but if i had the choice, the ungrateful. why? Because he seems to need a kick in the rear to get him going in the right place.. Doing something nice for him/her will get them thinking.. Maybe i should change my ways..
2007-09-16 07:49:35 · answer #7 · answered by Hummbaba 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll ask the dishonest person whether he is willing to save the ungrateful one after i save him. If he says yes, i'll save the ungrateful. If he says no, I'll save him since he's lying and he'll save the dishonest.
2007-09-16 07:45:17 · answer #8 · answered by Charliemoo 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Dishonest. Because knowing that someone is dishonest, we can protect ourselves from him, by not trusting him.
The trouble with the Ungrateful is that we realize his being so, after we have made something good to him. This, hurts so very much! It is a betrayal
2007-09-16 08:12:35 · answer #9 · answered by Alice in Wonderbra 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Uhm don´t know.... I think I´ll save the dishonest.... I don´t like the ungrateful ppl.The most hated ppl are prepotents and magnificents... so I thinks there´s no prob with dishonest... is their problem no mines.... They can lie all they want..
2007-09-16 08:20:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋