Oh my dear---we have only just begun to fight.
Hug your TV, kiss your pictures of Ann Coulter and Bill O'Reilly, and keep praying to your God Citibank.
2008 is still a long way away. Do watch for the Move On block parties that will erupt when ANYONE besides the Bush Family is sworn in, Jan., 2009.
2007-09-16 06:52:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
11⤋
Why only thank Move On.org? We should also thank that bearded loser Bin Laden, whose tapes only embarrass the Democrats. The last tape sounded exactly like the DNC talking points. I'm sure the Republicans will make a point of this at their convention.
The reason Republicans will continue to get elected to the White House is that, in the end, the Democrats are exposed for the fuzzy thinkers they are. Even though a lot of people weren't thrilled with Bush, the alternative was a guy who would check the morning opinion polls before breathing a word. People finally got the message he was just a political wh@re.
2007-09-16 10:39:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Moveon.org, foreign owned by George Soros who said he would own the Democrats is well on his way. Isn't Hillary beholden to George for his campaign contributions? Yes, the website along with the lies from the NYT, and the candidates will certainly help a lot when it comes to the Republicans winning the vote in '08.
Most of America is far to intelligent to fall for Moveon.org propaganda.
2007-09-16 07:33:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Moody Red 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
WE ALL KNOW HOW RADICAL & ANTI-AMERICAN THAT
GROUP REALLY IS. NOTE TO PAUL IN HIS ANSWER HE CLAIMED THE GROUP DOESN'T REPRESENT THE DEMOCRATS ANY MORE THAN THE KKK REPRESENTS THE REPUBLICANS THAT'S NOT A GOOD ANALOGY SINCE MANY PEOPLE IN THIS SECTION REFER TO REPUBLICANS AS NAZIS OR WORSE.
2007-09-16 10:08:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isn't that akin to thanking a rattlesnake for shaking its rattle? No wait a minute, rattlesnakes have more honor and integrity than moveon.
2007-09-16 08:01:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Amen...Thank you Soros' Neocommunista.org for helping make Nov. 2008 a crushing socialist failure...(tears...sniff), thank you!
2007-09-16 09:44:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
And they assisted us in seeing how the democratic candidates are still the party of the indebted to special interest groups. If they can't stand up to moveon.org, they expect us to believe they can stand up to terrorist and protect our nation?
2007-09-16 07:22:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Move on dot org is so very anti-American
2007-09-16 10:44:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sweet Tea & Lemons 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Have you also noticed there names on here don't mach them at all? Peacemaker my behind, how hostile can you get? I love your question, and love moveon.org for showing how the party truly feels about our troops!
2007-09-16 07:06:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
moveon.org jsut stated the truth. Every independant panel--most composed of high ranking officers with far more experience than Pegraeus--found the "surge" is essentially a failure. Their findings--and the facts--contradict Petraeus' testimony.
In short--Petraeus, who has a duty to report honestly to Congress--lied. He not only betreyed his duty as an officer, he betrayed the best interests of this country and of the men and women serving under him.
moveon.org did not go far enough. Petraeus deserves to be relieved of command and retired--at the very least. His conduct may well warrent court-martial.
2007-09-16 07:39:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
8⤋
If moveon.org represents all Democrats like you say it does, does the KKK represent all Republicans?
2007-09-16 07:41:56
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋