English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I wonder because Libs are making up so much bologna about 9/11 and teaching their garb to our innocent children. We all know they're full of it, and on a mission to confuse others. What shall we do about it?


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtZSQccWQcOpbPj.6HRU6Yjty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20070821095240AAcXgET


Libs, your "theories" are DEAD, and wrong! Please stop trying to hurt your children, and America, your country with falsehoods? All of our kids need to know reality, not lies just because we want our party leaders to have control of the Presidency, and the Congress.

The link to the downfall of the conspiracy Liberal theorists is in the history channel link I have already provided.

Thanks, folks.

2007-09-16 06:28:41 · 18 answers · asked by xenypoo 7 in Politics & Government Politics

Let us hope they don't vote Alphabet.

2007-09-16 06:57:07 · update #1

18 answers

Not all Democrats believe 9/11 was an inside job. Only aluminum foil hat wearing lunatics who forgot to take their meds would believe such nonsense.

2007-09-16 06:34:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

I agree, a lot of the stuff they have come up with was just jumping to conclusions from the flash backs of watching two 100+ story building disintegrate into dust in less than 10 seconds. The complete and total failure of our government to protect the United States on that day was pretty hard to believe as well especially since they were receiving so many, many warnings of an imminent attack within the U.S. I wonder how history will record that. Let me tell you, it won't. Is it any wonder there are conspiracy theories?

2007-09-16 06:48:48 · answer #2 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 2 0

Don't engage that stuff. It's relatively harmless. If someone wants to waste their time investigating or whatever, be my guest.

What's the worst that could happen, they could be right! To my way of thinking it's rather irrelevant if the government knew or Bush was having breakfast with the Bin Ladins that morning or whatever, it's a fact, and history will eventually sort it out. Some of us are literally crying about spilt milk.


It was a human tragedy to be sure but in the scope of actual damage it pales in comparison to what happened to the residents of Baghdad or Kabul in "direct" response to those attacks.

Suck it up , do what's right for the country and do what you can to prevent it from happening again is all I ask.

If you were looking for an eye for an eye, that happened 12 days into the Afghani bombing campaign and 6 months before Iraq.

2007-09-16 06:37:51 · answer #3 · answered by Mark T 7 · 2 0

It's generally not people who are liberal who are into revisionist history.

Just watched Bill Moyers Journal today on my local pbs station www.pbs.org and the CBC in Canada over the years has covered alot of the same material and W and Cheney and Rice knew in JAN of 2001 about the Al Quaeda plots, Richard Clark was sending memos and they REFUSED to acknowledge him and them until Sept 4 2001 and then they still did absolutely nothing. I believe the 911 commission came out with the same findings.

So to my way of thinking Bush, Cheney and Rice should have been impeached for derriliction of duty and look what they got the US and the world into after that.

No revisionist history on the liberals , just GOP indifference and negligence to terrorism.

2007-09-16 06:39:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

That's not a liberal conspiracy theory, that's a nut job conspiracy theory. And sometimes its the far right that finds that scenario irresistible.
Not everything you disagree with is a Democratic theory, although you might disagree with Democrats anyway.
Most do not hold that reference to be in the least bit true.
You have your tin foil hat wearers on all fringes of the political spectrum

2007-09-16 06:35:21 · answer #5 · answered by justa 7 · 3 2

That's a pretty silly premise. You know, my parents taught me that FDR was aware of the attack on Pearl Harbor but did nothing to stop it; this kind of thinking has always gone on in this country and it gets all the attention it deserves.

And be careful about how much reality you want our children to know about - do you actually know the truth about our history? Do you really want to teach grade school kids the real truth about all of history??

2007-09-16 06:49:50 · answer #6 · answered by ash 7 · 1 2

--YEP------interesting to note-----those same nut jobs seem to feel Waco and Ruby Ridge were acceptable.----if they get a president and a majority in the house and senate-----you can kiss our way of life good-bye. We would soon become just another 3rd world nation led by the ruling elite.
------BUT TOGETHER WE CAN WIN----xenypoo------we are lifting the scales----one eye at a time.

2007-09-16 16:51:52 · answer #7 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 0 0

I am all for truth-telling in history; but shouldn’t we focus on more important truths like:

The unamimous vote of the 1797 US Congress and the signing into law of the following by President John Adams:

• “As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,…”?

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/barbary/bar1796t.htm

How about having them read former President George H. W. Bush’s book, ‘A World Transformed’ [1998]?

In it, he - Bush the Wiser - explained why removing Hussein from power would further destabilize the already volatile region with the possibility of causing regional (or greater) armed conflict. He also stated that if the US invaded Iraq and removed Hussein from power, it would:

1. result in America becoming stuck in a no-win Vietnam-like quagmire;

2. result in America losing its friends and allies;

3. result in America losing its standing in the world and its ability to lead and influence international political events; and

4. result in jeopardizing America’s own interests in the Middle East, undoing decades of intense effort to put ourselves in a position to be politically effective in the region.

Shoot, if they just learn how to spell ‘Afghanistan’ and name a non-Arab country that borders Iraq they will know more than most conservatives.

Or, how about some truth in science? How about teaching them the difference between an epistimology based on objective truth determined by the observation and analysis of real-world empirical data, and a collection of folktales and mythological beliefs made up by quasi-historic tribes of illiterate semi-nomadic Semitic goat herders who lived thousands of years ago?

2007-09-16 07:03:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Are you really that closed-minded that you would put all of us into the same small group?

I know of no Liberal who believes that 9/11 was carried out by anyone else but bin Laden.

And anyone who does, regardless of party is an idiot.

2007-09-16 06:55:50 · answer #9 · answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4 · 2 2

So is the "Clinton Body Count" conservatives! That conspiracy theory is as ridiculous as 9/11 being an inside job.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

2007-09-16 06:55:09 · answer #10 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers