I think Plutarch originally mentioned this paradox:
A ship said to have been Theseus' was preserved in the harbor of Athens for centuries as a memorial. Periodically parts of the ship would need to be replaced, and ultimately over time every single piece of the original ship had been replaced. The question then arose, is it still Theseus' ship?
The issue can be highlighted by imagining that when they were replacing the parts, the pieces of the original ship were collected and saved, and then put together to form another ship of identical design. Which one now is Theseus' ship?
Buddhist philosophy has a similar story about a chariot (King Milinda's). For the Buddhists the conclusion is that there is really "no such thing" as a chariot. It's all just parts arranged in a certain pattern -- in effect it's more of an event than a substance -- it's only as a matter of convenience that we designate such a pattern/ event as a "chariot." There's really "no chariot."
Your perspective?
2007-09-16
06:04:47
·
7 answers
·
asked by
bodhidave
5
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy