English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia – LIBS say nothing...

Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq – LIBS Cry Foul...

Bush’s dad helps him get into Yale where he is a C student – What an idiot, LIBS say

Gores DAD helps him get into Harvard where gets worse grades than Bush. Bush also has better grades than Kerry at Yale – LIBS have no problem! Just egg on their face!

Clinton dodges draft, does not serve at ALL - Good

Bush spends 5 years in Guard flying Jets until HONORABLE discharge – BAD

Clinton pardons Marc Rich - LIBS don't care

Bush commutes Libby's jail term - LIBS outraged

Obama admits doing COKE in college - LIBS don't care

It's Never proven that Bush did drugs of any kind - LIBS.....well you know the story!

2007-09-16 05:43:08 · 33 answers · asked by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 in Politics & Government Politics

33 answers

Not really,,,A toast to PNAC RULES..& .Bush & Karl Rove. chow freepress...P,S lets return Karl Rove..the mastermind.

2007-09-16 05:57:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 13

Wow you incredibly don't be attentive to something different than what lies different cons make up which you would be able to study. in case you make the worry to observe the completed video jointly as enticing your strategies concurrently you will learn some belongings you have been unaware of. the authentic nuclear selection, and in case you're able to desire to study Obama's e book, The Audacity of desire , isn't reconciliation. Republicans have used this almost each year.

2016-11-14 14:35:20 · answer #2 · answered by dorry 4 · 0 0

I'm with Intruder... the problem with the Left on these things is they continue unchecked.
The media, quick to hop on anyone else, gives them a free pass.
They just keep doing the same thing over and over.
I also find it humourous that you liberals here always say "dubious sources" when you can't deny the facts. You try to discredit anything not from the liberal media. Sad.
Why deny the truth?

Look, let's say this together:

If you insist on calling the war illegal, you CAN'T say you support the troops. You just called them criminals. So just say it as it is... you think the war is illegal and you're NOT i support of the troops.
If you support the troops, renounce the STUPID claims that the war is illegal.
Can't have it both ways... THAT IS HYPOCRISY!

2007-09-16 09:12:46 · answer #3 · answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3 · 1 3

Don't forget their utter hypocrisy regarding the media. In spite of their incessant bleating about Fox News, they certainly don't demand the same standards from their media outlets - which is most of the MSM.

Reuters photog uses Photoshop to make Israel look bad - silence from the left.

CBS ran a "story" using memos they *knew* were fake - silence from the left.

The LA Times ran a Photoshopped picture on their front page that made soldiers look bad - silence from the left.

The NY Times (never met a national secret not fit to print) ran a story in their weekly magazine that made the military look bad. They *knew* the story was false, yet ran it anyway. And, again - silence from the left.

Some moron write a blog for the Washington Post, calling our soldiers "mercenaries" and bleating about their "obscene amenities" - silence from the left. (Funny, too - I thought the whine was that the troops are under supplied - now they have "obscene amenities"? Make up your mind, you liberidiots.)

Finally, how about their hypocrisy when it comes to donating money? They love to be generous with everyone else's money, but their own? Not so much. I see that right here in my community. The majority of the community is conservative, but I happen to live near a bunch of liberals. We have several volunteer fire depts in our community, and they are funded almost exclusively by the communities they serve. Guess what? The only one that is underfunded is the one in the LIBERAL community.

2007-09-16 06:50:47 · answer #4 · answered by Jadis 6 · 2 3

In all honesty? No. The hypocracy of the left doesn't bother me. Remember, in order for there to be hypocracy, there have to ostensibly be standards. Since the left has only the "do whatever feels good" standard (Well, and the hatred of George Bush standard), I don't really see a lot of hypocracy. They DO live up to their words when it comes to those two things.

2007-09-16 07:47:19 · answer #5 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 2 2

And clearly there is no conservative hypocrisy in the United States..

The conservatives cry for GOVERNMENT OUT OF OUR LIVES...yet they intervened in the Terri Schiavo case.

Larry Craig openly condemned homosexuality...then he got arrested for propositioning homosexual sex.

Mark Foley supposedly fought child predators, and then he borderlined on it himself.

Conservatives cuddled up to Saddam Hussein in the 80s, only to oust him from power later.


There is plenty of hypocrisy on both sides of the aisle. As long as humans are humans, there will be hypocrisy running rampant, regardless of political affiliations.

2007-09-16 08:01:54 · answer #6 · answered by alphadeltahotel 2 · 3 3

what bothers me is that ther is no chack on the left. You can get away withmurder if it supports their agenda.
The Right has its hypocracy but at least they police themselves.

The left is just hopless. I have hope in the American people that logic will win over emotion. I see it every day. It is very hard to win over a crowd of liberals but very easy when you talk one on one with them. You begin by getting them questioning core beliefs by forcing them to use the first principles of logic.
Then you expose the hypocracy. Many people beleive that the left is the warm caring party. And the right is the cold corprate party. And when you sit down and think objectively about it the reverse is true.

2007-09-16 06:11:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8 4

I don't support hypocrisy. It's hard to find a politician who is not an hypocrite.

2007-09-16 10:18:52 · answer #8 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 1 0

The hypocrisy from both parties bothers me. It is hardly a liberal commodity. I distinctly recall recent events where conservatives have been busted for having inappropiate relations with young boys, soliticing male prostitution in a public bathroom, or embezzling money.
Most politicans from both sides know only how to preach morals and integrity, not live by them

2007-09-16 05:58:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 5

Hypocrisy from both sides bothers me. But, where really bothers me with the libs is how when they get caught, all they have to do is give a half assed apology, but let it be a conservative/Republican that gets caught and the world stops while they are persecuted.

While you listed many examples, two that you forgot were how while Bush was spending time in the Guard and the libs are pissed about that, they apparently have no problem with Clinton running to another country to avoid the draft.

One of my favorites (among many) has to be klan leader/Democrat Senator Byrd, who when called on being a klan leader shrugged it off with a half assed apology and by calling it a "youthful indiscretion".

2007-09-16 05:55:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6 9

To be hypocritical you have to be held to a moral code.
Since liberals have none they can't be hypocritical.

They sure can point it out in others but are kind of blind when it comes to them.

I am so use to it by now it doesn't surpise me.

Hillary,Obama, & Edwards can even find it to say anything against moveon.org's ad.

So why do you think they will ever hold one of their own accountable?

2007-09-16 06:23:01 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers