The production and sale of cigarettes must be outlawed for the health of the American public?

Answer 1

First I would like to say that I am not a smoker and hate being around other people's smoke in public (restaurants, bars, etc). I think that smoking should be completely legal and that the government should only legislate where people are prohibited from smoking, such as restaurants, bars, etc. The reason I feel this way is because when people smoke enclosed public places others are suffering due to the individual's poor health decision. However, if someone chooses to smoke in the privacy of their own home or vehicle or in an open area outdoors then I have no right to ask them to cease. I do not think that it is the government's responsibility to protect us from ourselves, at least not to such a degree. After all, we know that sugar is bad for us, as is margerine, and high fat content food, and excess sodium etc. Where do you draw the line at what should be legislated and what should not. Consider that most smokers are expected to die around age 65 and most people who consume high fat content food are expected to suffer a heart related death around the same age. So the lifespan is shortened by the same amount. Do you really want your government to tell you how much fat you can eat or how much sugar you can consume. It is up to the people to make their own good decisions, it is the duty of the government to protect us from other people's bad decisions.

Answer 2

Why?? because of the fact somebody else would not like them and says so? Why no longer- there are already regulations in place in specific factors banning some quickly meals.... helpful- enable's enable the government let us know what we can and can't do, can and can't purchase - lots less demanding than questioning or making our very own judgements!! Why can no longer human beings only enable others be? Oh confident- the "even nevertheless it impacts me too" card.....properly, the recommendations to make up my strategies for me are affecting me - do no longer i'm getting any say in that??? And please do no longer pass on relating to the wellbeing care situation- there is not any situation- I pay for my very own wellbeing care- massive time. that's mine to apply. that's what I pay for. And if i decide to smaoke and use it, then so be it. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that I do agree that because of the fact this is a private selection to smoke, no person must be allowed to sue anybody else over it. you're able to desire to pay on your very own judgements.

Answer 3

If outlawed, cigarettes will be smuggled in from Canada, Mexico and the carribean by heavily armed bandits in fast GunBoats.


Not to mention, tobacco provides much tax revenue and Lawsuit fodder for the government and greedy slimeball lawyers, respectively.

Answer 4

Luckily some civil liberties still exist. Freedom isn't to far a distant memory. The right of the person to choose their lifestyle still outweights the benefits the public receives from the banning of smoking, drinking, over eating, and whatnot

Answer 5

I used to be a smoker and I don't think what you are asking is true. While I do believe some smokers could be more considerate, it is their right to smoke. I also believe they should have to pay higher insurance premiums, should not be covered under medicare/cade, and should be fined for smoking around children. I also think that if they choose to smoke they shouldn't be allowed to gripe about the prices at the store, it is not the cashiers and storea that set the price, it is the vendors and government!

Answer 6

let me tell you that smoking has never caused me to be arrested, abusive,violent,a danger in my car,nasty tongued. BUT alcohol did all these things, as a recovering alcoholic i have seen more things happen during drinking than any cigarette could do. Also with an alcoholic father i would have preferred him to smoke believe me. Friends killed, suicide, imprisonment,homeless,divorce etc etc, when has a cigarette ever caused these things. There are more people filling up prisons cos of drink & drugs than smoking crimes. Maybe some focus should be put on these items.

Answer 7

Correct. Sir.

However, costs for elder care would shoot up, as smokers survive to 90, instead of 50.

If they are banned, the demand side must be crushed with cheap punishment, such as caning, with no ability of judges to change the punishment.

Or else, the ban would generate massive criminality in smuggled cigs, as happened in Prohibition.

Answer 8

I suppose you also think all people addicted to them should be lined up and shot? Or just incarcerated for life?

If you had the least grasp of the notion of freedom, you wouldn't try to outlaw everything you don't happen to do yourself or approve of others doing.

People have the right to do dumb things.

Should driving be outlawed? After all, it maims and kills, too.

Answer 9

Sounds good to me tired of all the butts everywhere & it stinks>And the health cost is herenders>Make them cost $10.00 a pack if they still buy them raise the price>

Answer 10

sure and when the gov finds a replacement for all the money it brings in im sure they will tell everyone just to stop it