A chief minister of a state which comprises of 85% Hindus, ridicules and mocks Hindu belief. He questions the Hindu faith about Ramar Sethu and says which college did Lord Ram graduate from? How did Rama become a structural engineer? When did he build Ram Sethu?
A senile degenerate like karunanidhi who is so corrupt and spoilt by his electoral success fails to realise as an elected Chief Minister he represents every citizen of the state and in turn has to respect all faiths and religions.
Faith needs no proof. If a flyover is built in Chennai during Karunanidhis tenure, the press and people would say Karunanidhi built the flyover. Does this mean he graduated in structural and civil engineering?
The idiotic and arrogant CM also degrades and mocks Hindus at any given chance.
Is it constitutionally right for an elected CM to mock the majority faith?
Is there proof for Kannagi whose statue he installed and garlanded?
Is this a civil debate for a CM ? Does he have no ethics?
2007-09-16
03:36:49
·
22 answers
·
asked by
roughelement
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
thanks for the responses. the overwhelming response of the forum shows karunanidhi is counting his days - vinash kale vibhreeth buddhi.
for man to destroy the Ram Sethu and to question is existence is like digging his own grave. politicians all over the world from iraq to burma to india and pakistan are all involved in anti people activity, dividing them and fuelling clashes and destruction. Kaliyug at its best. But these people will pay a hefty price for this.We will see in our lifetime how history teaches them a bitter lesson
2007-09-18
20:04:38 ·
update #1
THE COMMENTS OF NO FEAR AND MAHILAN SHOWS HOW DEGENERATE THE SUPPORTERS OF KARUNANIDHI CAN GET
AS SOME ONE SAID DOG HAS GONE MAD AND ALSO THE SUPPORTERS HAVE GONE MAD. NO WONDER THE BARKING HAS GOT SHRILL.....
Any one can type in caps. so dont come here and bark.
You seem pretty frustarted. You must be some converted drop out from college who got his seat in reservation quota and still cudnt get a job anywhere.
Karunanidhis and Mayawatis can make you more backward and degenerate but it wont assure you a plush or comfy life.
The more you bark and more you rant Hindus continue to prosper.
So much so for hijacking the topic.
The issue here is not reservations or economic freedom. The question is religious freedom. You say half of UP is living in mumbai. Thats becos of Mayawatis and Mulayam Singhs and Lalloo Yadavs, who got inspired by Karunanidhi and his rotten heritage.
AAnd moreover even in Mumbai people dont mock Hindus.
Dogs like you support Karunanidhi just for his money
2007-09-19
21:35:18 ·
update #2
Incarnations of god like Ram and Krishna were far too divine and good. In todays corrupt world even Gandhi may seem like unreal figure given his honesty and you are talking about the worst scum existing on the earth respecting Ram etc.
These people respect nobody not even their own family etc. they have no ethics, no rules nothing. How do you expect them to respect divine incarnations like Ram etc.
It is rather our bad fate that we are destined to co-exist with such evil people, I for once would like to see these people rot in the hell created by themselves and in this very life.
2007-09-16 22:38:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by funnysam2006 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If he(DMK chief) had contested the elections alone,he would not have got anything above 20.With the strength of the coalition he could get only 90 seats out of 234 assembly seats.Yet he has not shared the power with any other party,not even Congress which has accommodated him in the central cabinet.
The alternate AIDMK led by Jatalalitha is no better.
So,they are able to manipulate opportunistic coalitions holding the public for ransom.I think it is almost the same in UP and even elsewhere.
2007-09-18 03:51:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by karikalan 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Tamil people are highly religious.
You can see the number of devotees is steadly increasing by taking a look of HUNDI COLLECTIONS.
Also the wayside temples have increased many times.
Everybody can rest be assured that 1000 Peyiars cannot do any harm to the great HINDU RELIGION.
Then a natural question arises. Why Karunanidhi?
Because Tamil people don't mix religion with politics.
2007-09-19 02:01:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by INDRAN 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
To doubt the existence of Rama is to doubt all literature. There is no archaeological or epigraphic evidence for either Jesus Christ or Prophet Mohammed, who are known only from the Bible and Koran respectively. Does it mean they did not exist?
We cannot argue on the divinity of Lord Rama or any of the other so called "God", just because God cannot be argued about and should not be argued.
Rama’s memory lives on because of his extraordinary life and his reign, which was obviously a period of great peace and prosperity, making Ramarajya a reference point. Leftist historians and the so called pseudo secular politicians have chosen to rubbish archaeology, literature and local tradition. So how do we prove that Rama did exist?
Although there is enough evidence that Rama did exist, it still does not justify breaking down a mosque or killing innocent people. Would Rama have approved? It makes us as barbaric as Babar ,Mohammed Ghajini and others, and as barbaric as the portugese and british missionaries and armies.
2007-09-18 19:45:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by sita 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In a state which has 85% of Hindus out of which 95% are supporting Dravidian movements. What you consider as Hindus is 3% upper caste who control Indian politics and thus contribute to the national disaster.
The 97% people are rejected in Indian Politics and in Government jobs. That is the reason why reservations are implemented. India will become a true democracy when a backward people's representative becomes the Prime Minister.
Those who claim to be the protectors of Hindus can not even create a single state as clean and sophisticated as Tamilnadu. You visit the other states you can feel the difference. Dirty transport, half naked people, no electricity, no education, no safety and no roads.
The whole of UP and Bihar has migrated to cities like Mumbai. What is the reason? UP is having lot of protectors of Hindus. They can not maintain their states and develop them economically ? Is this the way they to help Hindus to come up? All of them use the name Hindu to cover up their inefficiencies.
2007-09-19 13:35:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
first thing karuna nidhi is s/c and he does not resepect the pandits at all who believe in god and that fool who is not even capable of a peons job has become chief minister and this is nothing but indias bad fate and he should also know that ram sethu was not built by ram but the then engieners nal and neel of sugreeves regime and they gave the name to it as ram sethu. when this bloody fool does not know any thing about it he should not say any thing as he is only after his kursi.Why people kill gandhiji and not these type of persons like mayawati,karunanidhi,lalloo prasad,mamta banerji and the list is so endless.As sonia is christian and manmohan singh has his gurunanak why they will bother about the existance of Ram at all. These guys should be kicked out from india right now.Why people always vote for indira randhi and family i dont understand ,It seems all male m.p.s are impotent in congress and hence they need a woman to rule them always.
2007-09-16 03:59:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by KRISHNA 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Sorry to correct your "misimpression".The CM
is not mocking the Hindu religion.He is actually
deriding God.What else can you expect of an athiest?Constitutionality does not arise in this issue.The people are responsible.When there is a 69% reservation for all other communities than the so called forward community and when out of the 69% a majority is not literate
leaders like Mr.Karunanidhi can be expected to cash in and milk it for all its worth.And to top it all this man who earlier hobnobbed with the BJP
now has the temerity to call himself a secular person and demand his pound of flesh like Shylock,when he offered to support the Congress led government,by asking for ministries of his choice.Such turncoats have
neither any conscience nor any moral scruples.
2007-09-16 04:13:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
My congratulations. I am glad you had the guts to put up this question. Religion is based on faith. Every religion whether Islam,Christianity,Sikhism etc is based on faith and we cannot prove each and every fact. Why this debate now? Is it to malign and shake this Hindu religion. Hindu religion is the oldest so many stories become myths over a period of time. Even a noble human Gandhi's stories of this century have become unbelievable to our younger generation.I request and wish our top bosses stop this debate before it goes beyond proportions. My feelings are deeply hurt.
2007-09-16 04:00:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by KAAL 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
In our country, you are well aware that some literates behave so worse than the illiterates that you tend to believe that illeteracy is much better than literacy. There is also one peculiar brand of our political leaders down south. They openly preach atheism and their wives(even, wives of one politician) pray God for their welfare. As long as they enjoy the patronage of their vote bank, they fear nothing. They even denigrate their own religion, but attend the religious functions of other religions and praise their Gods. Being atheists, they never tried to belittle the Gods of other religions. The atheists are honest individuals. Their intention has never been to hurt the sentiments of other people. They just follow atheism. They are well within their right to do so. But these peculiar breed of politicians belittle their own Gods taking for granted the sentiments of their own people, but remain cautious about the Gods of other religion. They will almost remind you of a ***** who knows which side of her slice is buttered. In fact, the ***** is honest. She does it openly. But, these politicians do it maliciously and secretly. If you want to know more about the traits of these so called atheists, you should consult Cho Ramasami.
2007-09-16 03:53:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Call this an outcome of dirty politics. Appeasement of minorities seems to be the reason for such statements by the CM.
Little does he realize that the people of the sate will kick his .... you know what in the next election.
2007-09-16 04:14:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by kiron p 3
·
2⤊
2⤋