Keep in mind that the Chemical based fluid they recovered, from the hire car, had Madeleine's DNA, in it! and that chemical could have only come frome a dead body, it was not blood
2007-09-16 02:22:47 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
toietmoi you cant answer this question., i wonder why?
2007-09-16 02:33:27 · update #1
toiet moi,, its been all over the news, for weeks now , and you know it.
2007-09-16 02:48:47 · update #2
Pretty hard to get fluid blood or otherwise with no body. I'm sure they didn't take samples from the twins.
2007-09-16 02:26:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
What fluid did they recover? Why could it only have come from a dead body? Why could it not have originated from inside the apartment and been transferred innocently? The PJ did not seal off the apartment. Madeleine's DNA was all over the place. I think it is possible for Madeleine's DNA to have been transferred to the hire car without her body being transported inside it. That does not mean I think that the DNA must have been planted.
2007-09-16 03:05:41 · answer #2 · answered by Trainman 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Get your facts right please.
It may be possible to see that a DNA sample has degraded because of where it was or the length of time between it being deposited and recovered but that does not tell you if the person is dead or alive.
2007-09-16 03:27:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
The protuguese polica appear to be anything but the keystone cops if they can now create body fluids from a corpse and pass it off as real to forensic scientists in a british lab
2007-09-16 02:38:27 · answer #4 · answered by georgie 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
You are talking confused nonsense based on police lies , the inventor of DNA fingerprinting said that NO DNA evidence against the McCanns has been found---anywhere.
2007-09-16 03:06:44 · answer #5 · answered by London Man 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
sources have told the mail on sunday that the hairs discovered in the hire vehicle were found in only very small quantities and not in the boot.
no roots were found in the sample which meant forensic experts were unable to test for an exact match to anyone. they were asked to determine sex and age.
the 'bodily fluids' brought the result of only an 88% match to maddies genetic profile.
i'm repeating what i read this morning.
2007-09-16 02:47:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Jomamoeuskadi: Surely the reason we ask questions is because we're not experts. That is a bit of a daft statement - to not ask a question unless we're an expert on what we're asking????
2007-09-16 09:06:09 · answer #7 · answered by snaffle 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Does anyone know what a paedophile fantasist is?
Dave?...anyone?
2007-09-16 09:01:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they rented the car after she disappeared
2007-09-16 02:28:51 · answer #9 · answered by lizziewindolene 2 · 9⤊ 2⤋
I thought they rented that car AFTER she disappeared??!!
2007-09-16 02:27:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 2⤋