But, if the police really suspect them, then why not subject them to a lie detector test?
2007-09-15 22:41:04 · 6 answers · asked by nickynoodles33 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
They are really unreliable, you may as well toss a coin. Especially if the person is good at controlling their emotions.
2007-09-15 23:02:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that would be a great idea as well. I think that should be the first thing the investigators should do in any missing child case, eliminate the family by lie detector testing and then go on with the investigation. I mean, don't delay in trying to find the child, but have someone spend the time clearing the parents. Why don't the police think abouth such things?
2007-09-16 05:57:35 · answer #2 · answered by ANDREA 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe because a lie dectector is not 100% accurate its only 96% and if they (McCanns) done the lie detector and it should they were lying then they would say they were that 4% that its not working etc
2007-09-16 05:46:01 · answer #3 · answered by mizzmamma 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow it really is Maddie Morning today isn't it.
2007-09-16 05:45:42 · answer #4 · answered by bruvvamoff 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have no evidential value in Portuguese law....so whats the point...you have been watching too many American TV shows.
2007-09-16 05:44:54 · answer #5 · answered by Knownow't 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hmmmm...really suspect who???
2007-09-16 05:48:41 · answer #6 · answered by †he unsen† 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋