.
Will they vote for Hillary Clinton or Barrack Obama , who both came out against gay marriage at the Gay Forum debate ?
Or will they vote for Rudy Giuliani or Mitt Romney who have actually said, they support gay marriage at some point in the past ?
2007-09-15 18:02:27 · 10 answers · asked by zooma 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What someone does in the privacy of their own bedroom is their business. I'm not sure why this is even an issue.
2007-09-15 18:09:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I will vote for Obama in the primaries (because I just like him a lot) and when he loses to Mrs. Clinton, I will vote for her in the big election.
My reason for this is that I hope Clinton asks Mr. Obama to be her running mate as VP.
Both Clinton and Obama have a HUGE gay following.
Gays just don't trust Republicans anymore... sadly, even though some Republicans are very good for gay rights - the ones that are bad are REALLY bad... like Romney.
Unlike many gay voters, I am ok with Civil Unions... I think of it as a step in the right direction even though it smacks of segregation.... Much like "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" was a step toward allowing gays to have our place in the military.
I prefer baby steps toward my freedom and equality - not grand, gay leaps of audacity and false confidence (think of 'The Fool' in the Tarot card deck...).
2007-09-15 18:16:41 · answer #2 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no longer all individuals are like that. that's like asserting that all and sundry Arabs are terrorists. the main severe circumstances are the only ones that make the information. i'm a gay guy and that i completely intend to be married, sometime. i've got in no way mailed poison to anybody and my suited pal is a clergyman who's openly antagonistic to gay marriage. in this usa, we've a separation of church and state. There are limitless church homes that oppose gay marriage yet there are some "equivalent rights" church homes that is prepared to marry us. The regulation won't be able to "rigidity" a church do to something, nor can the church rigidity the regulation to do something, so as which will in no way ensue. there are a number of criminal reasons that gays decide to get married. interior the traditional direction of existence, 2 at modern human beings gets married, have young toddlers and purchase a house, jointly. Then, because of the marriage settlement, if some thing have been to ensue to one substantial different or the different, the abode and the toddlers could pass to the the rest guy or woman. If I died the next day, my love could haven't any rights over my son. If he did, i could haven't any rights over the condominium or perhaps one yet another's vehicles, for that count number (and have confidence me, his daughter could only like to seize that 2009 Malibu) If one individuals became into interior the ICU, the place in basic terms "kinfolk" is authorized to pass to, the different would not be allowed in. If there have been a significant scientific selection to be made jointly as the guy in question became into no longer completely able to consent (comatose, case in point), the selection could fall on his daughter or my mom and dad and the different could haven't any say in it, by any ability. the main obligatory ingredient of gay marriage is the criminal facet. Granted, i'd like a non secular settlement, yet there are an excellent kind of church homes who're prepared to try this and interior america of a, there is not any "forcing" the church do something they do no longer decide to do. they seem to be a completley separate entity from the regulation.
2016-11-14 13:51:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a wedge issue just like abortion is. The President of the United States doesn't have any authority over either issue, so neither issue should enter into the decision-making process when it comes to this vote.
2007-09-15 18:13:55 · answer #4 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are ignorant for categorizing all liberals as gay marriage supporters.
John Edwards
1. Opposes gay marriage due to his religion (2007).
2. No gay marriage (Feb 2007).
Chris Dod
1. Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996).
Joe Biden
1. Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996).
2007-09-15 19:13:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They will vote for whoever will do the best job of losing the war, flooding the United States with illegal immigrants, and giving them handouts. That's what Hillary and Obama are all about. Homosexual marriage is impossible which is why it's a non-issue.
2007-09-15 18:12:15 · answer #6 · answered by qwert 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Gay marriage is only an issue to two types of folks:
1) gays who want to marry gays,
2) homophobes and people pretending to be straight.
We all know what they say about homophobes right?
The rest of us could care less about it, and it is a non-issue to truly straight people.
2007-09-15 18:19:20 · answer #7 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gay marriage is not the only issue in the election.
2007-09-15 18:13:23 · answer #8 · answered by October 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not all liberals support gay marriage and not all liberals pick their candidate based on this issue. Extremely lame question.
2007-09-15 18:12:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
greenspan says the iraq war is largely about oil.
if iraq exported bananas, we would not have troops there.
2007-09-15 18:14:40 · answer #10 · answered by soperson 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋