This is for republicans. I think we should seriously try to give Hilary Clinton a helping hand. Because if she wins the Democratic Nomination ..we will see another Republican in the Whitehouse.. here is why.
Hilary has a very dubious past. It hasnt come out yet because republican candidates are siting on it, hoping she wins the nomination. If she wins..the gloves come off. The whitewater investigation. The Rose law firm biling files that mysteriously disapeared then reappeared in the whitehouse..and Hilary saying that she didnt know how they got there. Or more importantly how she has conections with some very bad people like Johnny Chung, John Huang, Ng Lap Seng, Mochtar Riady, the McDougalds, Craig Livingstone, Webster Hubbell and Jorge Cabrera. There is alot more. Too much to post unfortunetly.. because id like to share... What the republicans have on her will make Swift boat vs john kerry look like amature hour.
Lets hope she wins.
2007-09-15 16:13:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hillarys past is very well known. I have a long memory.
2007-09-15 16:22:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do you recommend by ability of the 1st sentence? Palin is doing her activity in this campaign: energizing the campaign, getting herself accessible even with the media modifying her interviews and making her look undesirable. a brilliant form of individuals will disagree with here statements, yet McCain did no longer furnish the vice president nom to her because of the fact she appeals to females. McCain himself is quite 'superb of center,' between the main reasonable Repubs accessible. Palin appeals no longer merely to females, no denying that, however the Christian superb vote and conservatives further to the superb of the spectrum; an analogous votes that gave Bush the election. Palin won't be Hillary Clinton, yet she gets the Dems mad because of the fact she is a Republican lady that controlled to realize lots in her political profession even with the precise same status quo the Dems choose to alter in choose of females's rights.
2016-11-15 08:34:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have heard that argument before. But that sounds like caving in to me. Instead of wishing for her, maybe you should help out someone who truly should win. The best defense is a good offense, and you dont win by letting the enemy take over.
2007-09-15 16:27:01 · answer #3 · answered by cgi 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, because the Clintons were NEVER investigated for 6-7 years by Republicans.
Who knows what new stuff they can come up with.
2007-09-15 16:22:38 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have voted for more Republican presidents and senators... and I would vote for her over the GOP frontrunners. I don't want to but with the current crop of Republican candidates I will. Things need to change in America and all the frontrunners just want to talk to the far extreme right and appease them. I am tired of being ignored by this party.
2007-09-15 16:27:44 · answer #5 · answered by cattledog 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I like Fred and hope that he wins in a landslide over the socialist, pro-amnesty Hillary!
2007-09-15 16:55:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary has lots of people that really hate her. For years there have been groups that have said, "anybody but Hillary."
Hillary is a shrill socialist pro-amnesty candidate that will destroy our country, in my opinion. I agree that she has lots of baggage that hasn't been talked about yet. She does have one thing fighting FOR her, some European countries want her and the media loves her.
Personally, I will never vote for a pro-amnesty candidate.
2007-09-15 16:24:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Agreed! She;'s on an ego trip and will stop at nothing.
What is it they said about paybacks??
I think she'll be TIME's person of the year her first year in office, but after that it'll be all downhill.
2007-09-15 16:25:36 · answer #8 · answered by Barry auh2o 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've thought about that, but it's still not quite worth the risk.
2007-09-15 16:37:37 · answer #9 · answered by Dylan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh sure. Like there are so many pure hearts in our government now.
2007-09-15 16:22:55 · answer #10 · answered by gone 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋