generally is the sex better (oral and othewise) with forskin, or without.?

Answer 1

Nobody can give an entirely accurate answer, but most men seem to say with. A few who say without seem to be ones who had physical or psychological problems with their foreskin to begin with. But most men were circumcised as infants and don't know what they're missing. Those who get it done as adults usually get it done because they don't like their foreskin anyway, making them already biased, and also they have a different experience from those getting done as infants because it takes time (years) for the glans to dry up.

But it is undisputed that there are nerve endings in the foreskin and it keeps the head more sensitive, so I don't see how losing that can make sex better.

For the women, apart from a few brainwashed "ew uncut dirty" people who think circumcised is normal and right, foreskin seems to be best: http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com

Plus it makes foreplay easier, it's nice to be able to slide it around and stuff

Answer 2

Honestly it depends from guy to guy. Some guys have problems with their foreskins or don't like it, so to them it's better if they're circumcised. Men who were circumcised when they were really young couldn't know the difference. All in all, it's very hard to say, but there are some studies that might help answer your question.

Circumcision removes a lot of nerve endings found in the foreskin, and these nerve endings could contribute to sexual sensitivity (links 1, 2). Also there are some studies that seem to indicate that the foreskin may actually be beneficial to the sexual satisfaction/pleasure of not only the man, but the woman as well (links 3, 4, 5).

So in general, as long as the foreskin's working normally (which is true in the vast majority of guys with foreskins), he maintains good genital hygiene (which is really easy even with a foreskin), and he practices safe sex (which he should anyway), it looks like it's definitely possible that sex is better with a foreskin. This is the general trend from those studies, but on an individual level, it's hard to say. People are usually satisfied with what they've got, foreskin or not.

Answer 3

intercourse is a lot greater advantageous with a foreskin. i replaced into circumcised at delivery and am restoring my foreskin. My spouse used to get sore from intercourse and we would have liked lubricant. Now, she does not get sore and we don't choose lubricant. We the two take exhilaration in intercourse a good purchase greater now that I actually have a restored foreskin. The particularly undesirable section approximately circumcision is that when a guy gets older (mid-40s for me) the penis loses sensitivity by using fact the areas that are regularly secure via the foreskin are uncovered and rub against outfits. there's a reason Viagra is undemanding in the US. Older adult adult males like me choose it to make up for the shortcoming of sensitivity from circumcision. Restored, I now no longer choose Viagra.

Answer 4

I think that the only guys who could answer this question would be those who had sex prior to circumcision and then again afterward, they can compare one to the other. Those of us who where cut prior to any sexual activity and those who remain uncut would not know the difference simply from not having the opportunity to experience it both ways.
A female may be able to tell you which SHE prefers, but even she would not know the difference from a guys prospective.

Answer 5

Slutty girl here to chime in...

Foreskin is more fun!

EDIT: Just read the answer 2 above mine... Girls in the US won't go down on uncircumcised guys?! I really don't think your experience is usual... I don't know any girl (even girls that don't like the look of an uncut penis) who has refused to go down because of foreskin... Maybe you weren't keeping it clean??

I for one (seattle area, if anyone is interested) ;) can't keep my lips away once I discover that my latest boy toy is intact... I definitely prefer un-mutilated genitalia...

Answer 6

Having been circumcised at 18 I can guarantee sex is best cut! Sex w/foreskin is basically masturbating inside of them, while when cut you are actualy giving and receiving direct pleasure! If you are uncut I can tell you most girls in the USA well never go down on you, so the oral is a mute point!

Answer 7

I think its great being uncut when I get oral and have sex. The tip and foreskin is more sensitive. I have never had anybody say they will not give me oral because I am intact. We just wash it everyday and it stays clean no problem.

Answer 8

It doesn't really matter, but with foreskin the girl has more to play with, to slide up and down your penis, therefore giving you enhanced pleasure!

Answer 9

for a guy, yes. sex can be better with the foreskin intact as the penis is more sensitive. a woman can't feel any difference if he's circumcised or not.

Answer 10

I would assume with because you have more area on which your body can sense the feeling. I am sorry to say though it is easier health wise without it. If you love your child I suggest you don't remove it. That's just me.