English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You know how they said that we evolved form apes and stuff,and noahs ark?And that a giant meteorid crashed into the planet and killed off all the dinosaurs?What I think is that..ok,the dinosaurs could have lived at the same time as dinosaurs,and the humans had no idea of it,and,(God did not exist around this time)Then a meteroid crashed into the planet wiping out all humans and dinosaurs,and at the same time,creating lakes and rivers all around the world.Then they could have filled up with water after the flood as mentioned in Noahs Ark,filling the big holes in the ground with water(that the meteorids created)And then all the dinosaurs and humans drowned.Then God shows up and creates more humans.Then the continent(known as Pangea back then millions of years ago or so) splits up into what we now call like North America,Russia,Europe,Africa,Australia,and so on.

2007-09-15 14:13:14 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

Then as the years pass,we humans learn about the world and how it functions,we learn how to survive on our own,and learn about schools and stuff,maybe during that period,we gave the "big holes in the grounds"a name,maybe like,a "lake" and a "river"which could have been caused a looooooooooong time ago when the dinosaurs existed when the meteoroids crashed into the planet.But we just don't know it yet.And we may not find this out until like the year 300 or something,until scientist find out more about the Earth and all the things we have yet to explore.Does this sound like a good theory?Or does it sound really CRAZY?

2007-09-15 14:19:36 · update #1

oops I meant the year 3000..sorry :D

2007-09-15 14:27:09 · update #2

and why I say that dinosaurs could have existed at the same time as humans did,is because they had no way to prove it.They had no transportation back then to actually go explore Pangea,Pangea was way too big.the dinosaurs could have been way on the other side of Pangea,and nobody would have had a clue

2007-09-15 14:31:55 · update #3

Actually, I did not mean God did not exist during that time as he has always existed and I do stick with the Creation and not evolution in everything that evolves....

2007-09-15 14:40:24 · update #4

Why would Noah's arc suddenly have evidence of tablets found in Iraq (which they say have actually been sitting in some vault for about 20-30 years as no one could understand what they say? And that there was actually a flood but not on the scale of global? Who knows..they have only touched the surface and really don't know exactly what or where ...sounds like we have alot to discover yet!

2007-09-15 14:45:44 · update #5

12 answers

Interesting theory - too bad there's absolutely no scientific evidence to support it.
:(

2007-09-15 14:17:28 · answer #1 · answered by nixity 6 · 0 0

Well, your theory has a few holes that might need patching.

Firstly, if dinosaurs were all over the globe, then how would humans not know about them?

Also, why wouldn't there be any fossil evidence of the humans at that point.

We can let the meteors crash into earth and wipe out the dinosaurs, but why would God not make the dinosaurs again?

Remember that Noah's flood occurred way after this, so there is that time element to consider.

Now, when did God come into existence, and how? And, why would he have made humans?

It is a nice theory, but it does have a few flaws in it. Not to worry, lots of theories have a few holes in them. What you should do next with it is to refine it so that it doesn't have any holes in it and flows a bit better.

Think carefully, where might there be a flaw? Where might there be a prediction that might be tested somehow? Are there alternate explanations which must be considered or even disproven?

Good luck.

2007-09-15 21:22:54 · answer #2 · answered by drslowpoke 5 · 1 0

You sound crazy....you wasted a whole lot of time and brain power to come up with your "theory". Now, quit reading the bible and start reading some science books. BTW a theory is backed up with evidence - you have proposed nothing more than a hypothesis....and a really stupid one IMHO at that

2007-09-16 11:37:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It doesn't sound crazy but you need more facts to support your theory or you will get a lot of bad reaction to it most likely.

2007-09-15 21:22:01 · answer #4 · answered by O_o 2 · 0 0

It's sounds like you connected some theories together

2007-09-15 21:22:11 · answer #5 · answered by jumbledupmess 2 · 0 0

I think I'll stick to Creation. Evolution always gets a little crazy.

2007-09-15 21:22:36 · answer #6 · answered by ZEE 5 · 0 4

Yes.

Doug

2007-09-15 21:17:54 · answer #7 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 3 0

Lay off the Pixie Dust....

2007-09-15 21:22:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Your question is 'do you sound crazy?' Yes, you're crazy.

2007-09-15 21:37:34 · answer #9 · answered by Savo 2 · 3 1

I like the stuff you are on. :)

2007-09-15 21:22:31 · answer #10 · answered by worldneverchanges 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers