English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's Democracy in Action, and the anti-war movement speaks for the majority now.

2007-09-15 10:44:31 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

Do you know what impeach means? Do you know the process? I guess not. I think the reason we don't have these rallies is because the rest of us do know what it means.
Are your rallying? Or just using an avatar with a song lyric from the 70's? Speaks for the majority? How silly.

2007-09-15 10:59:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

What a joke you are saying the anti-war freaks speak for most Americans. If that were true you would have protests every day. When you liberal traitors try to have a protest so few people show up that it makes you all look silly and shows the world how few of you freaks there are.

2007-09-16 05:01:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Do what you'd like, just a few points. President Bush hasn't committed any impeachable offenses. In addition, while you are laying on the ground pretending to be dead, there are real soldiers really dying in Iraq. While the media is wasting valuable air time on you, our troops are fighting a war, building schools and hospitals, etc. You have a great time making an *** of yourself okay?

2007-09-15 12:35:40 · answer #3 · answered by rosi l 5 · 3 2

I cannot understand why the impeachment has not been started.
The Bush positions, lies, actions and crimes on behalf of aggrandizing power to an imperial presidency are not even n question--he is advancing a doctrine NOT now in law, which he has already practiced ON US citizens and which must never by our constitution's basis exist as collectivist doctrine in the first place. Remember life, liberty and thee pursuit of happiness, secured to each citizen adult by governmental servitors? These are selfish rights owned by each individual as a responsible citizen--and the balance of powers was devised to PROTECT, not take away these rights which one gains under regulations by claiming them non-negligently and watching out for others. De-regulation is treason. And so is every pseudo-theocratic postmodernist statism practiced by extremist Republicans.
Of course Mr. Bush deserves impeachment. Proof enough for conviction has to be up to the body that tries him to ascertain and render judgment upon. But the impeachment is a slam dunk in a real country--one that isn't an empire of tsars.
Keep reading the paper. if you don't see an impeachment, you'll know there isn't a country. This isn't political; it's a constitutional duty for non traitors in the elected government. Keep watching for patriots...but bring a long novel; it may be awhile.

2007-09-15 11:14:51 · answer #4 · answered by Robert David M 7 · 3 3

The anti war movement is probably much bigger than the pro war crowd by now but that doesn't mean they are the majority..I don't think so.

I think the majority is still apathetic,uninformed and not ready for action

2007-09-15 10:56:01 · answer #5 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 2 2

u sure bout that? i bet if the media stopped showin just the bad points of the Iraq war and showed some of the good parts then lots of people would support the war. Bush was right for invading Iraq, but his stratagy was wrong. do u really think the next president will get troops out of Iraq? yeah right. i say throw more troops in so we can get the job done quicker

2007-09-15 10:54:06 · answer #6 · answered by jrod 2 · 4 3

Because most of us dummies go to work. Silly us we don't sit around waiting for rallies. What was I thinking I could have been in line for a "paycheck" I didn't earn.

2007-09-15 11:36:27 · answer #7 · answered by locksniffer 3 · 4 1

Because Protesters have real Jobs too, Except for the die-hard like Cindy Sheehan, they protest everyday everywhere.

2007-09-15 11:27:42 · answer #8 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 2 2

It's naive to think Bush will be impeached. For all the bullsh it
that has happened and he's still in office.

2007-09-15 10:56:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

You sure as hell don't speak for me. The anti-war movement has too many idiots who think it's perfectly acceptable to disrespect our troops.

I don't think there is much worth going to jail over, but I think ***** slapping some spoiled, snot-nosed SOB who spit on a soldier would be well worth it.

2007-09-15 11:37:21 · answer #10 · answered by Jadis 6 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers