Interesting how the passage of only 4 years can play tricks on the mind.
2007-09-15 09:39:23 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, look at France. Not suffering 100 deaths a month in Iraq.
2007-09-15 09:43:10 · update #1
Actually Sarah, I stand for the truth. And I am still waiting for Bush to apologize for his lies.
2007-09-15 09:44:58 · update #2
I was one of them, triteadmn. But they have been trying to whitewash us out of history ever since.
2007-09-15 09:48:44 · update #3
No, everybody had different opinions about him dragging us into the war. Most people didn't know what to think! They thought if our president wanted war, then they would just go along with it because he "supposedly" knows what he's doing.
2007-09-15 09:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by Qu'est ce que tu penses? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You know, it's so funny. I see SO many people that say, 'I never supported the war. I was against it from the start.'
And yet, for 2 years after 9-11, I didn't hear so much as a peep from the opposition. I felt like I was on an island. I wonder...did the moderates just NEVER express thier apprehensions until it became socially acceptable? Or...did a great many of them change thier minds? I'm guessing that they changed thier minds.
I'm telling ya...I was HATED for a couple of years for questioning the war. No one could concieve that Bush lied about the W.M.D.'s, even when I would pull out the U.N. reports. It's a crazy country, my long-haired friend. Too many cattle...the wolves are getting fat.
Speaking of which, I saw a great quote on here today. It went something like,'In a democracy comprised of 5 sheep and 4 wolves...the sheep are still dinner.'
Except I messed it up. It was much more clever....
2007-09-15 09:51:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
first ingredient no longer enable him scouse borrow the election , the subsequent ingredient while he all started all those lies approximately WMD and blocked those weapon inspectors out of Iraq he ought to have been impeached the 1st sign of his loopy retarded strategies. He has continuously been a rattling fool all his existence and to enable him scouse borrow his way right into a Presidency no longer as quickly as yet two times, we necessary somebody to shake all individuals actual sturdy. Iraq became into greater useful off with Saddam as their chief that they had properties, electrical energy, warmth, Zoo's, faculties and that they've been living gentle till previous goofy had to commence a conflict. you will say he became right into a Dictator properly what are you living under a much bigger Dictator than he became into so how approximately that, we no longer have a Democracy., we are living under Dictatorship authentic at this 2d. What mess he has made in only 6 and a a million/2 years. i do no longer see anybody a Republican or what can take in for that loopy guy without strategies.
2016-11-14 12:56:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i know i didnt support the iraq war when it started. in fact i didnt support it at all up until about late 2006. i now do support it because i believe our nation is in a crisis and we need to be able to finish the job in iraq. if we pulled out of iraq before the job was done it could cause untold damage to america.
2007-09-15 09:51:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Were you living in a cave in 2003? There were hundreds of thousands of protesters in the streets against the invasion in America and millions all over the world.
2007-09-15 09:46:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I start with a recognition of our US governmental structure. Our Congress had the required votes to go.
In fact, I recall during one Kerry-Bush debate them both speaking of the Iraq invasion. Both supported one.
But I also was alive and in many circles then and now. And I have observed, with the passing of time, the hurrahs have fallen silent.
So, yes. I believe there was American support for the Iraq invasion. Whether you like it and want to remember it is your personal choice.
2007-09-15 09:45:20 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No.Are they really trying to rewrite history like that over there?I don't know what's more scary.The right trying or me not even being surprised about it anymore
2007-09-15 10:18:47 · answer #7 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i didn't.
however, many did because bush kept telling everyone it was "very likely" iraq had WMD's. he neglected to mention that this statement was intuition based. apparently, going to war just "seemed like a good idea at the time" to him.
2007-09-15 09:43:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I was never fooled by Bush's ad campaign.
I know BS when I hear it.
2007-09-15 09:57:43 · answer #9 · answered by obl_alive_and_well 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well back then ,I voted Dem,,,when in Rome ,do as the Romans,,,attack,,that's the plan now,,,hail camp victory,,chow freepress
2007-09-15 10:07:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋