The New York Times, for the clear bias in its "news analysis" and its selection of which stories to cover and investigate (i.e., Hillary / Hsu gets virtually no investigation and the Times covered the story at all only because the WSJ covered it), or Y/A, which consistently suspends non-Leftists soon after they reach Level 3?
2007-09-15 08:35:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is my fifth account. Every time I get to Level 3, within 2 weeks I get shut down. And I post the same things over and over, because the same lies are posted over and over and I feel the need to post the BLS data that show that no, the poor aren't poorer and there aren't more poor and unsinsured Americans just more poor and uninsured Mexicans living in America. And I post the similarities between what the terrorists say and do and what Muhammad wrote and did. You can think that's offensive or not (why facts are offensive I don't know), but it's not MORE offensive at any given point than it was three months earlier, yet all of a sudden the same posts get removed and the account gets suspended, starting when I hit level 3.........
The higher you go, the more air-time you get, thus they force you to start over. They pretend it's an even-handed debate but then they silence those on the other side. It's their website but they misrepresent what they're doing with it.
2007-09-15 08:50:04 · update #1
I am Truthsayer, Truthwillnotbesilenced, Trushisback and I also posted under my own name.
2007-09-15 08:50:45 · update #2
I read the WSJ and watch CNBC. I think that's as close to unbiased as you can get. Many people think NPR is unbiased, this is silly - they confuse absence of tone for absence of bias.
2007-09-15 09:37:18 · update #3
Avail, but you define 'civility' to mean agreeing with you.
2007-09-17 03:53:08 · update #4
I vote for the New York Times. They have been doing it for decades.
2007-09-15 08:41:53 · answer #1 · answered by Edward Hyde 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
hahahaha.
the Hsu story has been covered in depth by the NYT and people of all sorts get suspended by Yahoo,because they have no idea on how to administer their own reporting scheme.
2007-09-15 08:42:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
If you have a problem with the New York Times, you can always try to cancel your subscription and try another newspaper. If you are looking for bias news you will feel comfortable about, try Fox News, they are blaming the Petraus add on Hillery Clinton , i think you will enjoy that
2007-09-15 08:55:53 · answer #3 · answered by Michael G 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Both. Although I'm a level 4 conservative. Oops, shouldn't have pointed that out...now all the leftist liberals here will try to ban me. I'VE GONE TOO FAR!!!
2007-09-15 08:45:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
if non-leftists would learn how to act in a civil manner, they probably would not get suspended.
2007-09-15 08:44:47 · answer #5 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
That sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.
2007-09-15 08:43:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Hsu story has been everywhere. You'd have to be blind not to see it.
2007-09-15 08:41:59 · answer #7 · answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋