how come noone is giving bush credit for getting n.korea to halt their nuclear program?

Question

or foriegn policy credit for libya renouncing their program either?or bridging the gap with france?Or liberating fifty million people?

Answer 1

What did Bush do exactly to stop North Koreas program? It was a result of the UN, not Bush, through threatened sanctions.
In case nobody's noticed, North Korea always starts a nuclear program every 10 years or so when they need money, and we come and bribe them to stop. Worked again!!!
PS: I think Sarkovsky bridged the gap with us, not the other way around.

Answer 2

A) Bush did everything he could to stop the negotiations with NK from happening. he got dragged into it by people with enough sense to ignore him
2)Bush didn't have anything to do with the Lybian policy change--the Europeans did that
3) We didn't HAVE a "gap" with France until Bush screwed up our relations with that country--and his being buddy-buddy with a religious bigot like Sarkozy is hardly to his credit.
4)The Iraqis are fighting to get rid of Bush's "liberation" He's destroyed their country, their economy and infrastructure, gotten hundreds of thousands of people killed. As for Afghanistan--due to bush's incompetance, the Taliban have nearly retaken most of the country.

Answer 3

because bush deserves no credit. N korea is lying just like bush is a liar. N korea just wants the oil and all the other benefits bush will give them. They have other facilities hidden and ready to startup just as soon as the oil arrives. liberated 50 million people??? them people are so scared they carry two forms of ID one for USA and one for Al-queida.

Answer 4

properly now Bush is attempting to alter the intel rfile if u can see. For Bush, no longer something will convince him till he atk and then isn't able to locate. yet nonetheless i dont think of Bush is the type who could admit he lied, he continues to be searching for those WMDs in Iraq like OJ continues to be searching for the "actual murderers". He needs oil and shrink an enemy for Israel, its that straightforward. countless sources declare that Iran aint into nukes yet no longer something is "sturdy adequate " for Bush and his supporters

Answer 5

because they wouldn't have started it back up if it wasn't for Bush in the first place.

The whole purpose they restarted their nuclear program, is because Bush refused to give them the lightwater reactors that they were promised for dismantling their older heavy water reactors. They used it as a way to extort money and oil out of the US tax payer, like they do every so often.

neocons are all for giving welfare to NK to put their nukes back in the garage, but against it when it comes to their fellow American. you don't see a problem with that line of thinking?

Answer 6

because 90% of media are anti-american Bush haters.

Answer 7

B b b b b buuu ttt Bbbbbbush is incapable of doing anything right! Isn't he????
--[
. I'm with you 100%%%.
The Dems should get down on their knees and thank him. This is one less hot potato they will have to deal with.
Oh, yes. notice how John Kerry is nolonbger condemn ing the US for not etting a "global approval."

Answer 8

Bush can't even get his daughters to stop using drugs or getting drunk in public. How could he get N. Korea to stop using nuclear anything. He can't even find his zipper when he needs to go.

Answer 9

I give him credit, thanks and congratulations for doing a good job.
The left wing liberal loonies have been bashing Mr. Bush for so long and so relentlessly, they may not be capable of saying anything good about him.

Answer 10

we are still in a wait and see mode.