turned on President Bush and blamed him for the 911 attacks that were carried out by Islamofascist terrorists?
Or did they muster from deep within their cold, dark, lifeless souls the decency to wait another day or two?
2007-09-15 07:24:44 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, then 1 year later when the majorirty of the dems gave Bush the Authority to invade Iraq then 3 years later when they all decided they made a bad decision (It's too hard...whine!) and want to surrender. So much for liberal backbone!
2007-09-15 07:38:51 · answer #1 · answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Now I feel like I’m 17 again In the park, with a cold beer in my hand In with the wannabes of the hood, And the cold beer tastes really really good. It numbs my face as I walk home slicing through the cold damp midnight air. And realize my folks Are no longer home dead for some years now; And I gotta pee And pass by the bathroom mirror And see the 17 year old, All wrinkled and wasted But not at all a wizened Old man.
2016-05-20 03:28:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As I recall, the dust had not yet settled before Republican king makers Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson were on TV claiming that liberals, gays, etc were to blame for 9/11. Soon followed by president Bush blaming Clinton for it. These attacks were carried out as acts of religious devotion. Maybe you should start there.
2007-09-15 07:38:41 · answer #3 · answered by God 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Well, didn't Bush KNOW that something like 9/11 was going to happen? The summer before that event, he got a report that said that bin Laden was going to attack the U.S. So, he pretty much LET 9/11 happen. Also, in Florida, why did he not do ANYTHING about 9/11 for seven whole minutes?
2007-09-15 07:33:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Let's see-isn't it close to March 3rd,2008,the fifth anniversary of George Bush's ultimate whoring of 9/11,when he lied us into a war that he claimed was partly against an ally of Al Qaeda when it was and is abundantly clear that Bin Laden and Saddam were mortal enemies?
Wow.
How low can cons go to divert attention away from the fact that they're a bunch of hypocritical,murderous,lying thugs?
2007-09-15 07:36:42 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Their "phony" grief? You should be ashamed of yourself.
Nobody but far left loonies, who represent a small fraction of Democrats, started conspiracy theories about Bush. Do the far right nutjobs who claim that all Democrats hate our troops and love terrorists represent the bulk of the Republican Party? If they do, no wonder this country is sick to death of them and their smear tactics. Obviously you are one of them. Keep it up, you are part of the reason this country will never elect another Republican in '08 and that's just fine with me.
2007-09-15 07:49:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. it was this day along with many to follow that America began digging out of the rubble in search of her dead.
It is beyond contempt that anyone would post such a hideous statement concerning people's reactions just five days after 3000+ souls were snatched from this world.
2007-09-15 07:33:04 · answer #7 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
No... Wasn't this the day six years ago Bush began drawing up plans to invade Iraq?
2007-09-15 07:44:25 · answer #8 · answered by ck4829 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How disgusting that someone believes their fellow Americans weren't truly grieved about 9/11. I guess your political party is more important than understanding we were all horrified and sad.
2007-09-15 07:36:19 · answer #9 · answered by OPad 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
No, this is three days later than the day six years ago that Donald Rumsfeld said we had to attack Iraq, because "there were no good targets in Afghanistan", and Paul Wolfowitz blamed 9/11 on "Iraqi terrorism".
2007-09-15 07:31:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 3⤋