People don't realize a couple of things about Hillary Clinton. She's a mother and she raised a child, so she knows what that's about. She has a no-bullshit attitude. She's not afraid to say what's on her mind. And the one major thing that people are overlooking is that she's already been the first lady of this country. Her husband is also ,"BILL CLINTON", who was the president of this country. If she has a situation to deal with, is it not normal to ask your spouce what their opinion is? Together, the Clintons can bring this country back on its toes! A man with the last name of Hunt now owns the oil in Kirkuk. He's donated 35 million dollars to the Bush campaign. That's why we don't hear too much about Kirkuk. The Iraq war distracts the Americans from thinking about Kirkuk. It was on the news with the title of "BLOOD FOR OIL". We need the Clintons to stop stuff from happening that we're not even aware of. Bush's troop withdrawal is another distraction from Kirkuk. Any opinions?
2007-09-15 06:17:12 · 19 answers · asked by Joseph W 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have long believed that Hillary Clinton is the person most suited for the presidency at this time. More & more people are realizing this when they see her debate the other contenders & as they learn more about her. It was a smart idea to start campaigning early this time so people have more time to get to know her and not just all the BS that has long been propagated about the Clintons. No one has been under the microscope, scrutinized & investigated more than the Clintons & nothing of the rumors & accusations of illegal activities have been found to be true. Hopefully, Americans will be smarter with their votes this time around.
2007-09-15 11:09:09 · answer #1 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you on almost all points. But I do think that she will deal with most situations without having to consult with her husband, but Presidents do tend to seek counsel of past Presidents so basically you are right. I haven't seen a candidate yet who is as informed as she is about our problems in the Middle East. She has an astounding grasp on the intricacies of those complicated issues and I think she'll be incredibly effective in helping to straighten them out. Military brass has been very impressed with her knowledge on all things military and they will have great confidence in her. But Bill is obviously a great asset. If she is elected (and it's looking more and more like she will be) I hope she does make him a roving Ambassador. He is highly respected and well loved around the world, even during these times when the world isn't looking too favorably at we Americans. I think you are right, though some folks talk about the Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton dynasty we are in a position right now when we need someone who can step right in and not have to be trained on the do's and don't of the Presidency for a month before they start taking action. She's brilliant, she's qualified, and she's got my vote sewn up.
2007-09-15 07:00:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I accept as true with you. many human beings will look on the previous of the Clinton's because of the fact of her husbands indiscretions, yet in actuality, it took a actual guy or woman to forgive their mate and pass on and do the pastime they have been voted to do and did it o.k.. many human beings ignore the countless positives that got here from her husbands administration. The nationwide debt became into the backside in 30 yrs, smoothed over relatives with quite a few international locations, employment expenditures have been up, fee of living became into point, fewer companies have been shifting in another country, loan expenditures have been stable for the 1st time in 12 yrs and the final consensus of america as an entire became into sturdy. the only distinction with Clinton's and different politicians became into that he have been given caught getting somewhat sumtin' sumtin' on the facet, while no person else had. Who care?! He did his pastime and Hilary became into authentic in the back of him. She's been interior the nice and comfortable Seat and knows what to assume. She knows how the play e book is written and knows the thank you to paintings around it. howdy, 200 yrs of adult males working this usa hasn't have been provided that super of a song checklist. LOL only kidding adult males. Barack could be a sturdy candidate in yet another 10 yrs with somewhat greater adventure under his belt yet no longer authentic now. as long as human beings pass and vote for whoever they like, i'm going to be happy.
2016-11-14 12:32:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does being a mother have to do with being qualified or the most worthy person to be president? And who cares who her resident sperm donor happens to be? I despise the Bushes and the Clintons equally!! I say vote for the Libertarians!! They stay out of your business and believe in not bothering people which is something this country desparately needs to relearn!! The "Global Policeman"? What a crock!!
Besides didn't it occur to you that the Clintons will have their special friends just the the Bushes do with the Hunts? DO you remember Marc Rich? Webster Hubbell? Need I go on? Please take off the rose colored glasses, Pollyanna!! They are all selfish and evil and don't give a d*mn about you or me!
2007-09-15 06:37:15 · answer #4 · answered by A. S 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is not my ideal candidate, but she's way better than any of the Republicans. I am not registered Democrat so I can't vote in the primary, but I would probably vote for Kucinich. If Hillary gets the nomination, though, she has my vote.
The Republicans are building Hillary up as some kind of evil dragon-lady. They're doing the same thing with her that they did with her husband. But they are treating her as the 'presumptive' candidate. I believe they want her to get the nomination because they think she'll be the easiest to smear. And it wouldn't surprise me to learn they've been funneling money into her campaign--they have been caught doing this before in state races, secretly financing a candidate in the primaries that they believe they can easily beat in the general election.
If she gets the nomination you'll start hearing all kinds of stuff about her, as you did with her hubby. The GOP will make up lies about her and repeat them over and over, as they did with Bill and as they do with -every- Democratic candidate. But this time I don't know how effective that will be.
2007-09-15 06:28:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yes,Hillary is gonna win this thing and bring hope to America and the world.No one can swiftboat her out of the race.
She knows how politics work at the highest level.She will be ready to go from day one.No adjusting,nothing new or far less than anyone else.She's smart intelligent,strong on defense with respect for International law.This woman is a rare combination of vision and experience.Add to that Bill Clinton by her side
She's best for America and more and more Americans are waking up to that reality and rejecting the lies and fear mongering of the regressive right who had eight years,eight long years and delivered nothing but division and mismanagement in every level of government
2007-09-15 06:48:23 · answer #6 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yeah, Hillary Clinton, hmmm had papers shredded when they were under investigation for illegal land deals (Whitewater), tried to hide her illegal contributions from a lobbyist Hsu, tries to get military spending cuts that affects equipment, facilities, and training. Opinion Nope, she's just as crooked as the rest of the members of congress. The democrats have been a cowardly lot from inception, Democrats are the biggest ones with a history of putting this country in danger by defense spending cuts. Most of you don't remember it was a democratic run congress that made the BRAC (Base Realignment and Closure Act) Law, reducing our military capabilities prior to 9-11. Their answer to terrorist is to negotiate. Liar Bill Clinton couldn't even tell the truth about having an affair while president, yeah that's a great reference to use.
2007-09-15 06:31:26 · answer #7 · answered by GIOSTORMUSN 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bill Clinton apart frm the controversy was a good leader even without power he has demonstated what can be done by his charity programmes and he was miles ahead frm the bully Bush.
Hillary has the qualities and it will be good for the worlds oldest democracy to try out a women leader.
Sure she will have all the support frm Clinton and above all America needs to get back its image in the world which was tarnished by the acts of Bush.And Hillary seems capable of doing it.
And above all a lady has her charms in a male dominated politics world as Angela Merkel has proved for Germany.
2007-09-15 06:27:36 · answer #8 · answered by Roshan A 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
By the way not only is it common for a president to consult their spouce (from Washington on) but to run an idea past other people who have been president. So she may not just ask Bill's opinion as a spouce but as a former president. She may also ask opinions of Carter, GHW Bush and maybe even Dubya.
2007-09-15 06:25:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I'm sorry,but I disagree with you.
she is a corporate lackey who pleces the interests of big business above those of the nation.
The only honest person in this race and the most capable of bringing us back to a true democracy of the people,by the people,is Dennis Kucinich.
the man realizes that politics and politicians in modern day America is nothing more than a collection of petty,greedy,despotic thugs out to line their pockets.
2007-09-15 06:24:48 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋