i mean, come on!!!!!
2007-09-15 05:47:27 · 19 answers · asked by ...... 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
you people are sad
2007-09-15 05:55:08 · update #1
Many of those voteing for Hillary will be voteing for the fact that she is a woman not because of who she is.
The rest of the country who finds out what a political monster she is will stand against her.
Only a brainwashed few will actually conciously vote for her.
I just hope that the truth comes out about her before election day
2007-09-15 05:54:13 · answer #1 · answered by WCSteel 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
If Sen Chuck Hagel does not run on the Republican ticket for president, I would consider voting for Hillary. There is no one running on the current Rep. ticket that appeals to me.
2007-09-15 12:55:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unless a better candidate comes up, I would. I don't much like her but I wouldn't vote for a worse candidate for that reason...and that's pretty junior high snotty of you to call all the others sad if they disagree with you.
2007-09-15 13:19:17 · answer #3 · answered by ash 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Over a Republican, that would be an easy choice. Bush's economic policies alone can't compare with Bill Clinton's. Funny you ask this when Greenspan's book is coming out.
Supply side economics means you cut taxes and SPENDING.
Greenspan, who calls himself a "libertarian Republican" but had an eight-year alliance with Clinton and Democratic Treasury secretaries in the 1990s, praises Clinton's mind and his tough anti-deficit policies, calling the former president's 1993 economic plan "an act of political courage."
But he expresses deep disappointment with Bush. "My biggest frustration remained the president's unwillingness to wield his veto against out-of-control spending," Greenspan writes.
Greenspan accuses the Republicans who presided over the party's majority in the House until last year of being too eager to tolerate excessive federal spending in exchange for political opportunity. The Republicans, he says, deserved to lose control of the Senate and House in last year's elections.
"The Republicans in Congress lost their way," Greenspan writes. "They swapped principle for power. They ended up with neither."
2007-09-15 13:00:10 · answer #4 · answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is not exactly my ideal candidate for president, but if she gets the nomination she has my vote. She would make a MUCH better president than the one we have now.
I didn't vote for her husband either time, but he did a pretty good job, especially in retrospect. Eight years of peace and prosperity. And he cut -my- taxes, while Reagan raised them.
2007-09-15 12:53:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I would. She is intelligent, she is a good public speaker and she already has eight years of behind-the-scenes experience. I believe in her views on health care and I think she is one of the top contenders, can you give me any good reasons not to vote for her? All her shady money aside, everyone does it. Nancy Pulosi raised the minimum wage everywhere except in the US province where Starkist tuna has their factories, why because Starkist tuna head quarters is in her home district.
No one is perfect.
2007-09-15 12:53:48 · answer #6 · answered by darkestsith 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
So if we vote for Hillary, would it be her in the oval office getting the cigar treatment this time, or just another Intern?
2007-09-15 12:57:44 · answer #7 · answered by vladoviking 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I am a democrat.
I do not vote for socialists or those who support socialist agendas.
I do not vote for people who call our representatives names, spread rumors about them, or treat them as "guilty until proved innocent".
I do not vote for people who are seditious.
I do not vote for people who put their own ideology ahead of their country (unpatriotic).
I am not suggesting she does such things in saying this. You must make up your own minds.
I simply am stating my own voting ethics (all of them, not just the ones that decide in this case).
I will not be voting for our Former First Lady and Senator Hilliary Clinton.
She will always have my respect for her service to our country, as will Former President and Governor Bill Clinton, Former Governor and present President George Bush, and First Lady Laura Bush.
I will not cheapen myself by using "playground" tactics to argue about them rather than using intelligent discourse to argue to the issues and goals of our representatives.
I hope each voter will be true to their own ethics, not give in to political bigotry, and will choose what is best for our country regardless of their personal ideology (be patriotic).
Many of them will disagree with me about what is best. Some will vote for her because they think she is best for our country.
They have my full support for their patriotic decision even if I vote differently.
Those who vote for her (or anyone) for their own political agenda, or out of political bigotry, for their own ideology rather than the good of our country have only my contempt for their decision.
2007-09-15 12:59:58 · answer #8 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
What's there to vote for>
2007-09-15 12:52:42 · answer #9 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If she's the Democratic candidate,I will.
Who in their right minds would vote for another GOP thug?
2007-09-15 12:52:28 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋