as per hindu mythology both Lord Rama and Lord Krishna were the incarnations of Lord Vishnu one of the God fathers of the Hindu Gods AND Goddesses. Lord Ram was born to a Aryan father, a Kshtriya ( so called martial race) what about Lord Krishna ? was he also a Suryavanshi, but a Brahmin by caste or----
2007-09-15 04:25:09 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
You seem to mix one thing with other a lot. All persons west of Iraq are Aryans with blend of local dynasties. The entire world is divided in four main races. Cocosoids, Afroloids, Mongoloids, Austroloids. Aryans are Cocosoids. The variety of races available today is the result of permutation and combination with other races. India has Cocosoids in north, Austroloids in the south and mix races in the middle.
2007-09-16 05:26:03 · answer #1 · answered by Panchal J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Puranas give king lists which trace the geneology of royal personages.There are two lines. ; Suryavamsha and Chandravamsha. Suryavamsha is traced back to Ikshvaku; Chandravamsha to Ila. In the Suryavamsha there are two lines: the main Ikshvaku and the junior Janaka.In the Chandravamsha there are five main lines, including Puru's and Yadu's.
Rama is from the Ikshvaku line; Sita from the Janaka. Incidentally , Kekayi is from the Chandravamsha.Krishna is a Yadu. Further, Krishna is about 30 generations after Rama.
2007-09-17 00:34:38 · answer #2 · answered by Rajesh Kochhar 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Irrespective of what Karunanidhi thinks, in my understanding, Ram and Krishna were historical persons, although I'm not sure they were totally human. I've studied Indian Mythology for many years, and it agress well with Genesis chapter 6 where it says that Angelic beings came to live upon this earth. If Hindu mythology is understood from that viewpoint, its absolutely true. This is further corroborated by the findings of Zacharia Zitchin and VAn Daiken concerning civilisations in the Middle east.
2016-04-04 22:14:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lord Krishna was born to Vasudev and Devaki, the latter being the sister of Kamsa, a king and hence Kshatriya. Since krishna was brought up by Nandagopa, a shepherd, He was referred by His enemies as a non-Kshatriya. Both the avatars took place in different yugas. Why to talk of blood relation?
2007-09-15 05:01:07 · answer #4 · answered by rsudarsanlic 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
krishna a yadav - in current parlance an OBC.
barring vamana none of the incarnations is a brahmin.
kruta,treta, dwapara and kali are 4 time periods,the last named
one is the current.raama and krishna incarnation occurred in
treta and dwapara and so apparently not related by blood.
incidentally in both the avataras father was a king.
well info was long winded? well grin & bear it
2007-09-15 05:15:27 · answer #5 · answered by charlatan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
SriKrishna was born in a yadava kula.Sri Thyagarajar calls as "yadavakula murali".In Srimad Bhagavatgeetha Arjuna calls Krishna as "Varshneya".This means that He was born in Vreshni kulam.He wasn't born in suryavamsa.
2007-09-17 03:04:52 · answer #6 · answered by shri_92 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Krishna was but probably not ram
2015-05-10 05:36:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋